From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2DBC10F00 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 23:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738882133D for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 23:14:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1551395685; bh=pjWaxZNql3F0/t5xjbzqBvJc099CWofLnPE0Wc+1U6M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=gbD2CDdfANU9MhMnLTYAEwfVxVNQsh0MNF0lwUnEOPiEu8HSPmh8lIJWRDcnUcwG2 tlNnBTuWPc3zEbDV5026osapP/CFIIao/GomEKL3m2nQ3D95U4nyObi40hHZQiHNAu ezIn3EKQt8SbIG8TWFMRAluQmQO9Ux6hCU95jR+M= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732709AbfB1XOn (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 18:14:43 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:39246 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726631AbfB1XOl (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 18:14:41 -0500 Received: from akpm3.svl.corp.google.com (unknown [104.133.8.65]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFEA0A94E; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 23:14:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:14:38 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Dan Williams Cc: Mark Brown , "kernelci.org bot" , Tomeu Vizoso , guillaume.tucker@collabora.com, matthew.hart@linaro.org, Stephen Rothwell , khilman@baylibre.com, enric.balletbo@collabora.com, Nicholas Piggin , Dominik Brodowski , Masahiro Yamada , Kees Cook , Adrian Reber , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Johannes Weiner , Linux MM , Mathieu Desnoyers , Michal Hocko , Richard Guy Briggs , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , info@kernelci.org Subject: Re: next/master boot bisection: next-20190215 on beaglebone-black Message-Id: <20190228151438.fc44921e66f2f5d393c8d7b4@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <5c6702da.1c69fb81.12a14.4ece@mx.google.com> <20190215104325.039dbbd9c3bfb35b95f9247b@linux-foundation.org> <20190215185151.GG7897@sirena.org.uk> <20190226155948.299aa894a5576e61dda3e5aa@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.6.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:04:04 -0800 Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 4:00 PM Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 18:51:51 +0000 Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:43:25AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:20:10 -0800 (PST) "kernelci.org bot" wrote: > > > > > > > > Details: https://kernelci.org/boot/id/5c666ea959b514b017fe6017 > > > > > Plain log: https://storage.kernelci.org//next/master/next-20190215/arm/multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n/gcc-7/lab-collabora/boot-am335x-boneblack.txt > > > > > HTML log: https://storage.kernelci.org//next/master/next-20190215/arm/multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n/gcc-7/lab-collabora/boot-am335x-boneblack.html > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > But what actually went wrong? Kernel doesn't boot? > > > > > > The linked logs show the kernel dying early in boot before the console > > > comes up so yeah. There should be kernel output at the bottom of the > > > logs. > > > > I assume Dan is distracted - I'll keep this patchset on hold until we > > can get to the bottom of this. > > Michal had asked if the free space accounting fix up addressed this > boot regression? I was awaiting word on that. hm, does bot@kernelci.org actually read emails? Let's try info@ as well.. Is it possible to determine whether this regression is still present in current linux-next? > I assume you're not willing to entertain a "depends > NOT_THIS_ARM_BOARD" hack in the meantime? We'd probably never be able to remove it. And we don't know whether other systems might be affected.