From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: g@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
yhs@fb.com, lkp@01.org
Subject: Re: [uaccess] 780464aed0: WARNING:at_arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:#strnlen_user/0x
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 00:18:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190306001811.c7cf77cb26b9d816a7561e7b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190305145306.GL32477@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 15:53:06 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 10:58:01PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> > Could you tell me why WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task()) is needed in access_ok()?
>
> That came from here:
>
> lkml.kernel.org/r/20190225145240.GB32534@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
>
> Because in-irq usage is dodgy, since we don't actually know what mm or
> ds it loaded.
Yes, I would like to allow it only if setting pagefault-disable correctly.
(and setting ds too, it is good to me)
>
> > > I dislike that whole KERNEL_DS thing, but obviously that's not something
> > > that's going away.
> > >
> > > Would something like:
> > >
> > > WARN_ON_ONCE(!(in_task || segment_eq(get_fs(), USER_DS)))
> > >
> > > Work? Then we allow KERNEL_DS in task context, but for interrupt and
> > > others require USER_DS.
> >
> > But what would this mean? I can't understand why we limit using
> > access_ok() so strictly and narrow the cases.
>
> Because it's been a source of bugs. Any sanity checking we can put in
> seems like a good thing at this point.
Hmm, I see yours is strict, fit with current code, but complicated rule.
- strncpy_from_user() can access user memory with set_fs(USER_DS)
in task context
- strncpy_from_user() can access kernel memory with set_fs(KERNEL_DS)
in task context
- strncpy_from_user() can access user memory in IRQ context if
pagefault is disabled and with set_fs(USER_DS). (but pagefault-disabled
is not verified)
- strncpy_from_user() never allowed to access kernel memory in IRQ context,
even if pagefault is disabled and with set_fs(KERNEL_DS).
And mine is simple.
- strncpy_from_user() can access user memory with set_fs(USER_DS)
in task context
- strncpy_from_user() can access kernel memory with set_fs(KERNEL_DS)
in task context
- strncpy_from_user() can access user/kernel memory (depends on DS)
in IRQ context if pagefault is disabled. (both verified)
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-05 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-28 16:02 [PATCH v5 0/6] tracing/probes: uaccess: Add support user-space access Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-28 16:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] uaccess: Add user_access_ok() Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-28 16:03 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] uaccess: Use user_access_ok() in user_access_begin() Masami Hiramatsu
2019-03-03 17:39 ` [uaccess] 780464aed0: WARNING:at_arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:#strnlen_user/0x kernel test robot
2019-03-03 19:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-04 1:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-03-04 2:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-04 9:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-03-04 15:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-03-04 15:58 ` Jann Horn
2019-03-04 18:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-05 2:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-03-05 8:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-03-05 9:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-03-05 9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-05 13:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-03-05 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-05 15:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2019-03-04 3:20 ` [LKP] " Rong Chen
2019-02-28 16:03 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] uaccess: Add non-pagefault user-space read functions Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-28 22:49 ` Yonghong Song
2019-03-01 2:29 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-03-01 6:30 ` Yonghong Song
2019-02-28 16:04 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] tracing/probe: Add ustring type for user-space string Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-28 16:04 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] tracing/probe: Support user-space dereference Masami Hiramatsu
2019-02-28 16:05 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] selftests/ftrace: Add user-memory access syntax testcase Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190306001811.c7cf77cb26b9d816a7561e7b@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=changbin.du@gmail.com \
--cc=g@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome