From: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Lingutla Chandrasekhar <clingutla@codeaurora.org>,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, jeremy.linton@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arch_topology: Make cpu_capacity sysfs node as ready-only
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 12:14:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190307121400.cmgymfbphguvlaoo@queper01-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190307095750.GD29753@localhost.localdomain>
On Thursday 07 Mar 2019 at 10:57:50 (+0100), Juri Lelli wrote:
> If people think it's best to simply make this RO, I won't be against it.
> Just pointed out a conversation we recently had. Guess we could also
> make it RW again (properly) in the future if somebody complains.
Right, now is probably the time to give it a go before folks start
depending on it. And if I am wrong (and that happens more often than I'd
like unfortunately :-)) and there are users of that thing, then the
revert should be trivial.
Thanks,
Quentin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-07 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190306152254.GB19434@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
2019-03-06 15:27 ` Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-03-07 7:28 ` Juri Lelli
2019-03-07 9:31 ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-07 9:57 ` Juri Lelli
2019-03-07 12:14 ` Quentin Perret [this message]
2019-03-07 15:04 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-07 15:19 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-08 11:45 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-03-08 12:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-03-27 10:56 ` Quentin Perret
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190307121400.cmgymfbphguvlaoo@queper01-lin \
--to=quentin.perret@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=clingutla@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®