From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [v3] spi: work around clang bug in SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK()
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 16:54:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190307155506.2993868-1-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
Clang-8 evaluates both sides of a ?: expression to check for
valid arithmetic even in the side that is never taken. This
results in a build warning:
drivers/spi/spi-sh-msiof.c:1052:24: error: shift count >= width of type [-Werror,-Wshift-count-overflow]
.bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(8, 32),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Change the implementation to use the GENMASK() macro that does
what we want here but does not have a problem with the shift
count overflow.
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38789
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
v3: use GENMASK() instead of open-coding it
v2: add a code comment
---
include/linux/spi/spi.h | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
index 662b336aa2e4..b27386450089 100644
--- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h
+++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
@@ -444,8 +444,7 @@ struct spi_controller {
/* bitmask of supported bits_per_word for transfers */
u32 bits_per_word_mask;
#define SPI_BPW_MASK(bits) BIT((bits) - 1)
-#define SPI_BIT_MASK(bits) (((bits) == 32) ? ~0U : (BIT(bits) - 1))
-#define SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(min, max) (SPI_BIT_MASK(max) - SPI_BIT_MASK(min - 1))
+#define SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(min, max) GENMASK((min) - 1, (max) - 1)
/* limits on transfer speed */
u32 min_speed_hz;
--
2.20.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-03-07 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-07 15:54 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2019-03-11 9:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-03-11 17:24 ` Applied "spi: work around clang bug in SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK()" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2019-03-13 19:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-03-13 21:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-03-13 15:40 ` Mark Brown
2019-03-14 15:54 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190307155506.2993868-1-arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®