mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Zero initialize this_cpu in busywait_stop
Date: Thu,  7 Mar 2019 18:20:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190308012023.5709-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> (raw)

When building with -Wsometimes-uninitialized, Clang warns:

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c:1032:6: warning: variable 'this_cpu'
is used uninitialized whenever '&&' condition is false
[-Wsometimes-uninitialized]

time_after expands to use two typecheck with logical ANDs between them.
typecheck evaluates to 1 but Clang clearly gets confused with the logic
that as semantic analysis happens early in the pipeline. Fix this by
just zero initializing this_cpu as it will always be properly
initialized before the comparison below.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/415
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
---

Alternatively, this can be solved by having the return value of
local_clock_us(&this_cpu) be a local variable but this seems less
controversial.

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index c2a5c48c7541..06c0c952191f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -1027,7 +1027,7 @@ static unsigned long local_clock_us(unsigned int *cpu)
 
 static bool busywait_stop(unsigned long timeout, unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	unsigned int this_cpu;
+	unsigned int this_cpu = 0;
 
 	if (time_after(local_clock_us(&this_cpu), timeout))
 		return true;
-- 
2.21.0


             reply	other threads:[~2019-03-08  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-08  1:20 Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2019-03-08  8:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-03-08 19:26   ` Nick Desaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190308012023.5709-1-natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --to=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®