mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
	hpa@zytor.com, dyoung@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/kdump/64: Change the upper limit of crashkernel reservation
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 12:48:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190312094838.f4agowhd5rlaa3hn@kshutemo-mobl1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190312005004.19182-4-bhe@redhat.com>

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 08:50:04AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> Restrict kdump to only reserve crashkernel below 64TB. Since the kdump
> jumping may be from 5-level to 4-level, and the kdump kernel is put
> above 64TB in 5-level kernel, then the jumping will fail. And the
> crashkernel reservation is done during the 1st kernel bootup, there's
> no way to detect the paging mode of kdump kernel at that time.
> 
> Hence change the upper limit of crashkernel reservation to 64TB
> on x86_64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index 3d872a527cd9..d4d1366738a4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -451,16 +451,26 @@ static void __init memblock_x86_reserve_range_setup_data(void)
>  #define CRASH_ALIGN		(16 << 20)
>  
>  /*
> - * Keep the crash kernel below this limit.  On 32 bits earlier kernels
> - * would limit the kernel to the low 512 MiB due to mapping restrictions.
> - * On 64bit, old kexec-tools need to under 896MiB.
> + * Keep the crash kernel below this limit.
> + *
> + * On 32 bits earlier kernels would limit the kernel to the low
> + * 512 MiB due to mapping restrictions.
> + *
> + * On 64bit, old kexec-tools need to be under 896MiB. The later
> + * supports to put kernel above 4G, up to system RAM top. Here
> + * kdump kernel need be restricted to be under 64TB, which is
> + * the upper limit of system RAM in 4-level paing mode. Since
> + * the kdump jumping could be from 5-level to 4-level, the jumping
> + * will fail if kernel is put above 64TB, and there's no way to
> + * detect the paging mode of the kernel which will be loaded for
> + * dumping during the 1st kernel bootup.
>   */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>  # define CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX	(512 << 20)
>  # define CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX	(512 << 20)
>  #else
>  # define CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX	(896UL << 20)
> -# define CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX	MAXMEM
> +# define CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX	(1ULL < 46)

Maybe

# define CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX (64UL << 40)

to match the notation for the rest of defines?


Otherwise the patchset look good to me. You can use my ack for all of
them:

Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

>  #endif
>  
>  static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void)
> -- 
> 2.17.2
> 

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-12  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-12  0:50 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add restrictions for kexec/kdump jumping between 5-level and 4-level kernel Baoquan He
2019-03-12  0:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/boot: Add xloadflags bits for 5-level kernel checking Baoquan He
2019-03-12  0:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/kexec/64: Error out if try to jump to old 4-level kernel from 5-level kernel Baoquan He
2019-03-12  0:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/kdump/64: Change the upper limit of crashkernel reservation Baoquan He
2019-03-12  9:48   ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2019-03-12 10:12     ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190312094838.f4agowhd5rlaa3hn@kshutemo-mobl1 \
    --to=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®