From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C923C4360F for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC5C21019 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:58:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1552499922; bh=WHf/DXL1lo3CuYfpYO3OWAVnfUc8JIXRRfX5+T0WIRE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=vcZmmLZwxvPnPIsnXjfxNEropC/b8nW/Dsxh3UN4ujbxg2zFDGsl972TquO8FFrY6 XpfH8446rrc7dNRyJp7NBUWTi68NwPoiGO6biKKx1rvsfx0vMje3WzS8gLWvkd9r0n gjIK1iZ6keFy15pXpLI8WRZ78o1In5hw74RFz5Eg= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726809AbfCMR6l (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:58:41 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34552 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726328AbfCMR6l (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:58:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [12.27.65.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 474C920854; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:58:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1552499920; bh=WHf/DXL1lo3CuYfpYO3OWAVnfUc8JIXRRfX5+T0WIRE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OJRcSX0uSh9CH7ZjqRVYugUzUxIjp1KblUkwBReUfcOYx/BKbBaZME/CJBpeGSMoX JZFy2XXayR9xKlietFDdjaChBAymgELpL4mt5YuE8RoaB2rxvtyooxD60h8li3YtPj XbtJPQLrV3wDT3i5ZisxY1NW0ABfGasD89/nYS2Y= Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:58:39 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/96] 4.9.163-stable review Message-ID: <20190313175839.GA27267@kroah.com> References: <20190312171034.530434962@linuxfoundation.org> <20190313144434.GA11117@roeck-us.net> <20190313151429.GB9719@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190313151429.GB9719@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 08:14:29AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 07:44:34AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:09:18AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.163 release. > > > There are 96 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Thu Mar 14 17:10:06 UTC 2019. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > Early results: > > > > Building x86_64:tools/perf ... failed > > -------------- > > Error log: > > Warning: arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h differs from kernel > > Warning: arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h differs from kernel > > PERF_VERSION = 4.9.162.g605129 > > builtin-trace.c: In function ‘perf_evlist__add_vfs_getname’: > > builtin-trace.c:2071:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strstarts’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > builtin-trace.c:2071:3: error: nested extern declaration of ‘strstarts’ [-Werror=nested-externs] > > > > Also affects v4.4.y-queue. > > Hm, at first I was worried about my backport, but if it hit 4.4 as well, > that's not my fault :) > > I'll look at this after breakfast, thanks! I can't even get perf to build without any stable queue patches for 4.9.y at the moment, nor for 4.4.y, so something is odd, or I just have too "new" of a system. Let me go dig up a debian box to see if I can at least find a way to start to reproduce this... greg k-h