From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E33C43381 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04B620863 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:33:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729632AbfCYQdf (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:33:35 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:43178 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726743AbfCYQde (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:33:34 -0400 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D8619B1; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:33:33 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: "Tobin C. Harding" Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] docs: Fix various build warnings/errors Message-ID: <20190325103333.700c2772@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20190307211153.28400-1-tobin@kernel.org> References: <20190307211153.28400-1-tobin@kernel.org> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 08:11:44 +1100 "Tobin C. Harding" wrote: > I had a few hours to spare so I thought I'd clear some Sphinx build > warnings/errors. So there were comments on various parts of this series; were you planning to respin it with those taken into account? Certainly we're all in favor of fewer warnings! Thanks, jon