From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4FDC10F05 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD8A20870 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="mre2L5rx" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726567AbfDALD5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Apr 2019 07:03:57 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com ([209.85.208.196]:42132 "EHLO mail-lj1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725882AbfDALD5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Apr 2019 07:03:57 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id v22so3031546lje.9 for ; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 04:03:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YiCiS1Zhnbd3fQPNfsi5vJTpnrNw+zSlVcGSn/ESGsI=; b=mre2L5rxLZz9BI69ewP/lJ+Cmz8RPbAJDgXxv5x964fEb/LWlH16VYXblgie+iMRf+ lHBL+6e6AcBNQxg1PiH8xJduAztSln6xOZgEeMDmvlcYv0Pvn5r+Oe+vPTNhIvj8b3+y ralhDrCyq7Bnr6MK0PfJvrVeh+6edaXJI/9DMLltCoL04YmCETBWGki8vs/VXPSyYvAa HYKVUhX1pDOCzdQXLFHt+7vAH0GmxZluA/jLWl9VbTPtdeOYoEqgX3C7uVAkyvTM3xyn fPSWtfvOxwwd/bVIAIM4PFeuCqiFFEhO9Gaf7E4LkfRUBnFuw7yrQjdYuhjL8VrSUcN0 Lv6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YiCiS1Zhnbd3fQPNfsi5vJTpnrNw+zSlVcGSn/ESGsI=; b=PHMmBuEW4vPxV+zNY5kc+ojAliAvMfiqaytqW9tUWTr721pRrjnh0vuSavX6oAT9yu n43IXHx6Q5HG86BhzY/yEa0UkTyeJDz65tx7yCB3AsMLpEka5QrNJxWXh4by52Zkheus CL/X+CHFBLr4D150UDdNcv6gwuqWHlnmUwTvzaetsIINVL+ATog5GQVKN6pFvwjNyvH2 gV5+VlZJ07nPZqNIOdFwThREcAN97O8elis9h9fv/aweM0zevNcuIixO7SZiuNUXK1LJ cPbY7CLH6FuiDcUctt7v6Q7xkA17Kx6fDwUSVRbphbkENu3SAs8r65+5/cDGrpfJ4D4x swFw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVuMsz4k/5FRfYx5i2dz7rCRBdurPWcI8RuGKGAqlmqZ4/LwE89 +IKRNhpU9NdRNlZJuInurmCRjLLPi1Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzqm+A6vWviSeMyVdsq3PTk8FVZSVOOR+xTIUZVf2V1/IpJfx46V0LxrOwPJU9Jy4R7E4pFYg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:96cb:: with SMTP id d11mr9047927ljj.157.1554116634897; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 04:03:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc636 ([37.139.158.167]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w19sm1334465lfe.23.2019.04.01.04.03.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 01 Apr 2019 04:03:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 13:03:47 +0200 To: Andrew Morton Cc: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" , Michal Hocko , Matthew Wilcox , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , Thomas Garnier , Oleksiy Avramchenko , Steven Rostedt , Joel Fernandes , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] improve vmap allocation Message-ID: <20190401110347.aby2v6tvqfvhyupf@pc636> References: <20190321190327.11813-1-urezki@gmail.com> <20190321150106.198f70e1e949e2cb8cc06f1c@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190321150106.198f70e1e949e2cb8cc06f1c@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Andrew. > > It's a lot of new code. I t looks decent and I'll toss it in there for > further testing. Hopefully someone will be able to find the time for a > detailed review. > I have got some proposals and comments about simplifying the code a bit. So i am about to upload the v3 for further review. I see that your commit message includes whole details and explanation: http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit.cgi/linux-mmotm.git/commit/?id=b6ac5ca4c512094f217a8140edeea17e6621b2ad Should i base on and keep it in v3? Thank you in advance! -- Vlad Rezki