mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tipbuild@zytor.com
Subject: [tip:WIP.x86/stackguards 19/29] arch/x86//kernel/nmi.c:493:52: error: 'cea_exception_stacks' undeclared
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 06:57:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201904050650.UcTSZW9Y%lkp@intel.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7970 bytes --]

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git WIP.x86/stackguards
head:   f06282dacdf39de480ede989a689743402e1110c
commit: 2e2333a2ed97c5df6bac64f689a1d4695e8e9ec9 [19/29] x86/exceptions: Split debug IST stack
config: x86_64-randconfig-x003-201913 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0
reproduce:
        git checkout 2e2333a2ed97c5df6bac64f689a1d4695e8e9ec9
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=x86_64 

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/asm-generic/percpu.h:7:0,
                    from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:544,
                    from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:6,
                    from include/linux/preempt.h:78,
                    from include/linux/spinlock.h:51,
                    from arch/x86//kernel/nmi.c:13:
   arch/x86//kernel/nmi.c: In function 'is_debug_stack':
>> arch/x86//kernel/nmi.c:493:52: error: 'cea_exception_stacks' undeclared (first use in this function)
     struct cea_exception_stacks *cs = __this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
                                                       ^
   include/linux/percpu-defs.h:318:9: note: in definition of macro '__pcpu_size_call_return'
     typeof(variable) pscr_ret__;     \
            ^~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/percpu-defs.h:446:2: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_cpu_read'
     raw_cpu_read(pcp);      \
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/x86//kernel/nmi.c:493:36: note: in expansion of macro '__this_cpu_read'
     struct cea_exception_stacks *cs = __this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/x86//kernel/nmi.c:493:52: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
     struct cea_exception_stacks *cs = __this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
                                                       ^
   include/linux/percpu-defs.h:318:9: note: in definition of macro '__pcpu_size_call_return'
     typeof(variable) pscr_ret__;     \
            ^~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/percpu-defs.h:446:2: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_cpu_read'
     raw_cpu_read(pcp);      \
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/x86//kernel/nmi.c:493:36: note: in expansion of macro '__this_cpu_read'
     struct cea_exception_stacks *cs = __this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/percpu-defs.h:444:1: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
    ({         \
    ^
>> arch/x86//kernel/nmi.c:493:36: note: in expansion of macro '__this_cpu_read'
     struct cea_exception_stacks *cs = __this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/x86//kernel/nmi.c:494:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'CEA_ESTACK_TOP'; did you mean 'STACK_TOP'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     unsigned long top = CEA_ESTACK_TOP(cs, DB);
                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                         STACK_TOP
>> arch/x86//kernel/nmi.c:494:41: error: 'DB' undeclared (first use in this function)
     unsigned long top = CEA_ESTACK_TOP(cs, DB);
                                            ^~
>> arch/x86//kernel/nmi.c:495:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'CEA_ESTACK_BOT'; did you mean 'STACK_TOP'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     unsigned long bot = CEA_ESTACK_BOT(cs, DB1);
                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                         STACK_TOP
>> arch/x86//kernel/nmi.c:495:41: error: 'DB1' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'DB'?
     unsigned long bot = CEA_ESTACK_BOT(cs, DB1);
                                            ^~~
                                            DB
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
   In file included from include/asm-generic/percpu.h:7:0,
                    from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:544,
                    from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:6,
                    from include/linux/preempt.h:78,
                    from include/linux/spinlock.h:51,
                    from arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:13:
   arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c: In function 'is_debug_stack':
   arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:493:52: error: 'cea_exception_stacks' undeclared (first use in this function)
     struct cea_exception_stacks *cs = __this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
                                                       ^
   include/linux/percpu-defs.h:318:9: note: in definition of macro '__pcpu_size_call_return'
     typeof(variable) pscr_ret__;     \
            ^~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/percpu-defs.h:446:2: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_cpu_read'
     raw_cpu_read(pcp);      \
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:493:36: note: in expansion of macro '__this_cpu_read'
     struct cea_exception_stacks *cs = __this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:493:52: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
     struct cea_exception_stacks *cs = __this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
                                                       ^
   include/linux/percpu-defs.h:318:9: note: in definition of macro '__pcpu_size_call_return'
     typeof(variable) pscr_ret__;     \
            ^~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/percpu-defs.h:446:2: note: in expansion of macro 'raw_cpu_read'
     raw_cpu_read(pcp);      \
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:493:36: note: in expansion of macro '__this_cpu_read'
     struct cea_exception_stacks *cs = __this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/percpu-defs.h:444:1: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
    ({         \
    ^
   arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:493:36: note: in expansion of macro '__this_cpu_read'
     struct cea_exception_stacks *cs = __this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:494:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'CEA_ESTACK_TOP'; did you mean 'STACK_TOP'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     unsigned long top = CEA_ESTACK_TOP(cs, DB);
                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                         STACK_TOP
   arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:494:41: error: 'DB' undeclared (first use in this function)
     unsigned long top = CEA_ESTACK_TOP(cs, DB);
                                            ^~
   arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:495:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'CEA_ESTACK_BOT'; did you mean 'STACK_TOP'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     unsigned long bot = CEA_ESTACK_BOT(cs, DB1);
                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                         STACK_TOP
   arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:495:41: error: 'DB1' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'DB'?
     unsigned long bot = CEA_ESTACK_BOT(cs, DB1);
                                            ^~~
                                            DB
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +/cea_exception_stacks +493 arch/x86//kernel/nmi.c

   490	
   491	static bool notrace is_debug_stack(unsigned long addr)
   492	{
 > 493		struct cea_exception_stacks *cs = __this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
 > 494		unsigned long top = CEA_ESTACK_TOP(cs, DB);
 > 495		unsigned long bot = CEA_ESTACK_BOT(cs, DB1);
   496	
   497		if (__this_cpu_read(debug_stack_usage))
   498			return true;
   499		/*
   500		 * Note, this covers the guard page between DB and DB1 as well to
   501		 * avoid two checks. But by all means @addr can never point into
   502		 * the guard page.
   503		 */
   504		return addr > bot && addr < top;
   505	}
   506	NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(is_debug_stack);
   507	#endif
   508	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 23543 bytes --]

                 reply	other threads:[~2019-04-04 22:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201904050650.UcTSZW9Y%lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tipbuild@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®