From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Subject: [patch V2 17/29] x86/exceptions: Disconnect IST index and stack order
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 17:07:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190405150929.938480649@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190405150658.237064784@linutronix.de>
The entry order of the TSS.IST array and the order of the stack
storage/mapping are not required to be the same.
With the upcoming split of the debug stack this is going to fall apart as
the number of TSS.IST array entries stays the same while the actual stacks
are increasing.
Make them separate so that code like dumpstack can just utilize the mapping
order. The IST index is solely required for the actual TSS.IST array
initialization.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_entry_area.h | 11 +++++++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h | 9 ++++-----
arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 10 +++++-----
arch/x86/kernel/idt.c | 8 ++++----
6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
@@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ apicinterrupt3 HYPERV_STIMER0_VECTOR \
hv_stimer0_callback_vector hv_stimer0_vector_handler
#endif /* CONFIG_HYPERV */
-idtentry debug do_debug has_error_code=0 paranoid=1 shift_ist=ISTACK_DB
+idtentry debug do_debug has_error_code=0 paranoid=1 shift_ist=IST_INDEX_DB
idtentry int3 do_int3 has_error_code=0
idtentry stack_segment do_stack_segment has_error_code=1
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_entry_area.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_entry_area.h
@@ -34,6 +34,17 @@ struct cea_exception_stacks {
ESTACKS_MEMBERS(0)
};
+/*
+ * The exception stack ordering in [cea_]exception_stacks
+ */
+enum exception_stack_ordering {
+ ISTACK_DF,
+ ISTACK_NMI,
+ ISTACK_DB,
+ ISTACK_MCE,
+ N_EXCEPTION_STACKS
+};
+
#define CEA_ESTACK_TOP(ceastp, st) \
((unsigned long)&(ceastp)->st## _stack_guard)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
@@ -28,11 +28,10 @@
/*
* The index for the tss.ist[] array. The hardware limit is 7 entries.
*/
-#define ISTACK_DF 0
-#define ISTACK_NMI 1
-#define ISTACK_DB 2
-#define ISTACK_MCE 3
-#define N_EXCEPTION_STACKS 4
+#define IST_INDEX_DF 0
+#define IST_INDEX_NMI 1
+#define IST_INDEX_DB 2
+#define IST_INDEX_MCE 3
/*
* Set __PAGE_OFFSET to the most negative possible address +
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
+
+#include <asm/cpu_entry_area.h>
#include <asm/switch_to.h>
enum stack_type {
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1731,11 +1731,11 @@ void cpu_init(void)
* set up and load the per-CPU TSS
*/
if (!t->x86_tss.ist[0]) {
- t->x86_tss.ist[ISTACK_DF] = __this_cpu_ist_top_va(DF);
- t->x86_tss.ist[ISTACK_NMI] = __this_cpu_ist_top_va(NMI);
- t->x86_tss.ist[ISTACK_DB] = __this_cpu_ist_top_va(DB);
- t->x86_tss.ist[ISTACK_MCE] = __this_cpu_ist_top_va(MCE);
- per_cpu(debug_stack_addr, cpu) = t->x86_tss.ist[ISTACK_DB];
+ t->x86_tss.ist[IST_INDEX_DF] = __this_cpu_ist_top_va(DF);
+ t->x86_tss.ist[IST_INDEX_NMI] = __this_cpu_ist_top_va(NMI);
+ t->x86_tss.ist[IST_INDEX_DB] = __this_cpu_ist_top_va(DB);
+ t->x86_tss.ist[IST_INDEX_MCE] = __this_cpu_ist_top_va(MCE);
+ per_cpu(debug_stack_addr, cpu) = t->x86_tss.ist[IST_INDEX_DB];
}
t->x86_tss.io_bitmap_base = IO_BITMAP_OFFSET;
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
@@ -183,11 +183,11 @@ gate_desc debug_idt_table[IDT_ENTRIES] _
* cpu_init() when the TSS has been initialized.
*/
static const __initconst struct idt_data ist_idts[] = {
- ISTG(X86_TRAP_DB, debug, ISTACK_DB),
- ISTG(X86_TRAP_NMI, nmi, ISTACK_NMI),
- ISTG(X86_TRAP_DF, double_fault, ISTACK_DF),
+ ISTG(X86_TRAP_DB, debug, IST_INDEX_DB),
+ ISTG(X86_TRAP_NMI, nmi, IST_INDEX_NMI),
+ ISTG(X86_TRAP_DF, double_fault, IST_INDEX_DF),
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE
- ISTG(X86_TRAP_MC, &machine_check, ISTACK_MCE),
+ ISTG(X86_TRAP_MC, &machine_check, IST_INDEX_MCE),
#endif
};
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-05 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-05 15:06 [patch V2 00/29] x86: Add guard pages to exception and interrupt stacks Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:06 ` [patch V2 01/29] x86/irq/64: Limit IST stack overflow check to #DB stack Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 02/29] x86/dumpstack: Fix off-by-one errors in stack identification Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 03/29] x86/irq/64: Remove a hardcoded irq_stack_union access Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 16:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-05 16:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-05 17:18 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-05 17:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 04/29] x86/irq/64: Sanitize the top/bottom confusion Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 16:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 05/29] x86/idt: Remove unused macro SISTG Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 06/29] x86/exceptions: Remove unused stack defines on 32bit Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 07/29] x86/exceptions: Make IST index zero based Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 18:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 08/29] x86/cpu_entry_area: Cleanup setup functions Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 19:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 09/29] x86/exceptions: Add structs for exception stacks Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 20:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-05 20:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-05 21:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 10/29] x86/cpu_entry_area: Prepare for IST guard pages Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 11/29] x86/cpu_entry_area: Provide exception stack accessor Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 12/29] x86/traps: Use cpu_entry_area instead of orig_ist Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 13/29] x86/irq/64: Use cpu entry area " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 14/29] x86/dumpstack/64: Use cpu_entry_area " Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 15/29] x86/cpu: Prepare TSS.IST setup for guard pages Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 16/29] x86/cpu: Remove orig_ist array Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2019-04-05 21:57 ` [patch V2 17/29] x86/exceptions: Disconnect IST index and stack order Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-05 22:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 18/29] x86/exceptions: Enable IST guard pages Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 19/29] x86/exceptions: Split debug IST stack Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 20:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-05 21:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 20/29] x86/dumpstack/64: Speedup in_exception_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 21:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-05 21:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 21/29] x86/irq/32: Define IRQ_STACK_SIZE Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 22/29] x86/irq/32: Make irq stack a character array Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 23/29] x86/irq/32: Rename hard/softirq_stack to hard/softirq_stack_ptr Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 24/29] x86/irq/64: Rename irq_stack_ptr to hardirq_stack_ptr Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 25/29] x86/irq/32: Invoke irq_ctx_init() from init_IRQ() Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:27 ` Juergen Gross
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 26/29] x86/irq/32: Handle irq stack allocation failure proper Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 27/29] x86/irq/64: Split the IRQ stack into its own pages Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 28/29] x86/irq/64: Remap the IRQ stack with guard pages Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-07 4:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-07 6:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-07 9:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-07 9:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-07 14:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-07 22:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-08 2:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-08 6:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-08 16:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-08 16:36 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-08 16:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-08 18:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 15:07 ` [patch V2 29/29] x86/irq/64: Remove stack overflow debug code Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190405150929.938480649@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome