From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=EIds=SH=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC1DC4360F
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri,  5 Apr 2019 16:19:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8057620643
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri,  5 Apr 2019 16:19:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1731427AbfDEQTA (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:19:00 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59724 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726694AbfDEQTA (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:19:00 -0400
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F3B6307E040;
        Fri,  5 Apr 2019 16:18:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from treble (ovpn-123-87.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.123.87])
        by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B17EE5C1B4;
        Fri,  5 Apr 2019 16:18:54 +0000 (UTC)
Date:   Fri, 5 Apr 2019 11:18:52 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] cpu/speculation: Add 'cpu_spec_mitigations='
 cmdline options
Message-ID: <20190405161852.nmpk22omgiety4df@treble>
References: <cover.1554396090.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
 <f0bd17358ab478eaca52f3b1da8305c150911b40.1554396090.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
 <20190405131211.GE23348@zn.tnic>
 <20190405142048.burthk2jnpcvi2om@treble>
 <20190405152059.GG23348@zn.tnic>
 <20190405160136.GI23348@zn.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190405160136.GI23348@zn.tnic>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.42]); Fri, 05 Apr 2019 16:18:59 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 06:01:36PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Thinking about this more, we can shave off the first 4 chars and have it
> be:
> 
> spec_mitigations=
> 
> I think it is painfully clear which speculation mitigations we mean. And
> the other switches don't have "cpu_" prefixes too so...

Sure, I'm ok with renaming it to that, if there are no objections.

-- 
Josh