From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AD6C10F06 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 11:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7415C2087F for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 11:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="a20QgqD4" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726535AbfDFLWX (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Apr 2019 07:22:23 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-f66.google.com ([209.85.161.66]:40463 "EHLO mail-yw1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726036AbfDFLWW (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Apr 2019 07:22:22 -0400 Received: by mail-yw1-f66.google.com with SMTP id p64so3267671ywg.7 for ; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 04:22:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=zIWMF1R93QZItw73bSxup0eAGPLoi4yPEdVTTG3P0l8=; b=a20QgqD4uW4B3Rs+6cjMACWRmeB4oPCY/j9zmrWNWt42djjcOWINIptpdt7OniFRTs hCTf7GKg5bDurD9n4yyKFPyj3y3AwVVn0pFZ2U3aJfmqQXOmlyvMzilLMPHeoiQkENZG 1qPgKsJIZ+Z4OIhhjgrUZNhJSNTx/885ovv+3uq6Gifm5lvxnNBAPy/3DIkZuUUaW/Me cfsepwG7vyTr9bvLQit9BJrjvv5x4mgQn1m5srNmD5OTpgQhBHP5/KXCx43TInY7+phK 3QrpNJ4sdScZ0/g1d1Jq/W3CNMd9Iak0JU05Tg0av4pu83fwhpybOyBWW4f7Vx8nvQQb NVlQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=zIWMF1R93QZItw73bSxup0eAGPLoi4yPEdVTTG3P0l8=; b=lKugka/j0+AcGLq9kCZ3LSqQnlGI4HIJfdWCoRPkX2Mt+uv7PBMfPRmA9bh4kiRMpI aFvfP9gdkvHh6HtffnA+T7cBtAdfwKjkbnQzprJByS6xYooOSzf5XMkC0q7ryer3yg73 Ofkio1+LP2Le8gZa+lGyGEYG3zvqMyWc5FPAGe/lt0WTiK62jPpsO0yMkCiNAWY8a8y0 Aa04sRivZgJxuAWX0ACRSN/s1rLQBB4IXhPZ3hZLXJ6IXuExBLoKzqTPI3VJ0Fqm4wLz fjtUBdJMG+oGXXjgAKSItvR8uZNwmVn6sTzhCEPckKiBkW5AfrOcYzEli1R+oAXy+GE5 LKZw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUB16QdCEe0jKMBRkE4gU7m5E8Wg3Z2tZf4vZDmPJQpdNXWZUMe Md013IcvHiR1tSa9S24iNoizBg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwgF+DBaVZpWvKYikGIZNq1CHKcP+h0/bYMEdXtStb9fERIdJp9VuYgiq+xcG++kR7KEjeEjw== X-Received: by 2002:a0d:fb87:: with SMTP id l129mr14992561ywf.432.1554549741641; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 04:22:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (li931-65.members.linode.com. [45.56.113.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w22sm12729360yww.58.2019.04.06.04.22.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Apr 2019 04:22:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Leo Yan To: Mathieu Poirier , Suzuki K Poulose , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Wanglai Shi , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Leo Yan Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Add new compatible for static replicator Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 19:21:42 +0800 Message-Id: <20190406112145.15184-2-leo.yan@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190406112145.15184-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> References: <20190406112145.15184-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CoreSight uses below bindings for replicator: Static replicator, aka. non-configurable replicator: "arm,coresight-replicator"; Dynamic replicator, aka. configurable replicator: "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; The compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is not an explicit naming to express the replicator is 'static'. To unify the naming convention, this patch introduces a new compatible string "arm,coresight-static-replicator" for the static replicator; the compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is still kept thus we can support the old DT binding, but tag it as obsolete and suggest to use the new compatible string. As result CoreSight replicator have below bindings: Static replicator: "arm,coresight-replicator"; (obsolete) "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; Dynamic replicator: "arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell"; Signed-off-by: Leo Yan --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt index f8aff65ab921..f8f794869af2 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt @@ -69,7 +69,11 @@ its hardware characteristcs. * compatible: Currently supported value is (note the absence of the AMBA markee): - - "arm,coresight-replicator" + - Coresight Non-configurable Replicator, the compatible string + "arm,coresight-replicator" is obsolete, keep it to support + the old DT bindings: + "arm,coresight-replicator"; + "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; * port or ports: see "Graph bindings for Coresight" below. @@ -169,7 +173,7 @@ Example: /* non-configurable replicators don't show up on the * AMBA bus. As such no need to add "arm,primecell". */ - compatible = "arm,coresight-replicator"; + compatible = "arm,coresight-static-replicator"; out-ports { #address-cells = <1>; -- 2.17.1