mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@intel.com>
To: Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
Cc: Vishwanath Somayaji <vishwanath.somayaji@intel.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wysocki@google.com,
	Rafael J <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	furquan@google.com, evgreen@google.com, rajatxjain@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Instantiate pmc_core device on legacy platforms
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:32:03 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190408180202.GA769@raj-desk2.iind.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190405203558.19160-3-rajatja@google.com>

On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 01:35:58PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:
> Add code to instantiate the pmc_core platform device and thus attach to
> the driver, if the ACPI device for the same ("INT33A1") is not present
> in a system where it should be. This was discussed here:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1966991.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
> ---
> v3: (first version of *this* patch -to go with rest of v3 patchset)
> v2: (does not exist)
> v1: (does not exist)
> 
>  drivers/platform/x86/Makefile                 |  2 +-
>  .../platform/x86/intel_pmc_core_plat_init.c   | 64 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core_plat_init.c

Can we call this intel_pmc_core_plat_drv.c instead?

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile
> index 86cb76677bc8..83d0bb9a14bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/Makefile
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_BXTWC_PMIC_TMU)	+= intel_bxtwc_tmu.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_TELEMETRY)	+= intel_telemetry_core.o \
>  				   intel_telemetry_pltdrv.o \
>  				   intel_telemetry_debugfs.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_PMC_CORE)    += intel_pmc_core.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_PMC_CORE)    += intel_pmc_core.o intel_pmc_core_plat_init.o

ditto

>  obj-$(CONFIG_PMC_ATOM)		+= pmc_atom.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MLX_PLATFORM)	+= mlx-platform.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_TURBO_MAX_3) += intel_turbo_max_3.o
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core_plat_init.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core_plat_init.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..45be89e7586c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core_plat_init.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +/*
> + * Intel PMC Core platform init
> + * Copyright (c) 2019, Google Inc.

I'd like to consult Andy and Darren if we should also have Intel Copyright
too?

> + * Author - Rajat Jain
> + *
> + * This code instantiates platform devices for intel_pmc_core driver, only
> + * on supported platforms that may not have the ACPI devices in the ACPI tables.
> + * No new platforms should be added here, because we expect that new platforms
> + * should all have the ACPI device, which is the preferred way of enumeration.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
> +#include <asm/intel-family.h>
> +
> +static struct platform_device pmc_core_device = {
> +	.name = "pmc_core",
> +};
> +
> +static int dummy;
> +/*
> + * INTEL_CPU_FAM6 macro won't take NULL for driver_data (uses &driver_data),
> + * thus provide a dummy driver_data.
> + */
> +static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pmc_core_ids[] = {
> +	INTEL_CPU_FAM6(SKYLAKE_MOBILE, dummy),
> +	INTEL_CPU_FAM6(SKYLAKE_DESKTOP, dummy),
> +	INTEL_CPU_FAM6(KABYLAKE_MOBILE, dummy),
> +	INTEL_CPU_FAM6(KABYLAKE_DESKTOP, dummy),
> +	INTEL_CPU_FAM6(CANNONLAKE_MOBILE, dummy),
> +	INTEL_CPU_FAM6(ICELAKE_MOBILE, dummy),
> +	{}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_pmc_core_ids);
> +
> +static int __init pmc_core_platform_init(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* Skip creating the platform device if ACPI already has a device */
> +	if (acpi_dev_present("INT33A1", NULL, -1) ||
> +	    !x86_match_cpu(intel_pmc_core_ids))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	ret = platform_device_register(&pmc_core_device);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

we can just return platform_devie_register (...) and avoid extra lines and
variable.

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit pmc_core_platform_exit(void)
> +{
> +	if (!acpi_dev_present("INT33A1", NULL, -1) &&
> +	    x86_match_cpu(intel_pmc_core_ids))
> +		platform_device_unregister(&pmc_core_device);
> +}
> +
> +module_init(pmc_core_platform_init);
> +module_exit(pmc_core_platform_exit);
> -- 
> 2.21.0.392.gf8f6787159e-goog
> 

-- 
Best Regards,
Rajneesh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-08 18:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-13 22:21 [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Convert to a platform_driver Rajat Jain
2019-03-13 22:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Allow to dump debug registers on S0ix failure Rajat Jain
2019-03-16  8:30   ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2019-03-18 15:13     ` Rajat Jain
2019-03-18  9:31   ` Somayaji, Vishwanath
2019-03-18 15:18     ` Rajat Jain
2019-03-18 16:01       ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2019-03-20 10:35         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-03-20 19:04           ` Rajat Jain
2019-03-16  8:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Convert to a platform_driver Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2019-03-18 15:06   ` Rajat Jain
     [not found]     ` <3fc03e60-492a-e9b5-ac9b-caa17f8a8e27@linux.intel.com>
2019-03-23  0:30       ` Rajat Jain
2019-03-25 10:23         ` Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
2019-03-26  1:41           ` Rajat Jain
2019-03-29  3:41             ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2019-03-29  5:29               ` Rajat Jain
2019-03-29 15:53                 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2019-04-04  0:59                   ` Rajat Jain
2019-03-20  1:04 ` Rajat Jain
2019-03-20  1:04   ` [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Allow to dump debug registers on S0ix failure Rajat Jain
2019-04-05 20:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Convert to a platform_driver Rajat Jain
2019-04-05 20:35   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Allow to dump debug registers on S0ix failure Rajat Jain
2019-04-08 17:02     ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-08 18:36       ` Rajat Jain
2019-04-08 18:41         ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-08 18:58           ` Rajat Jain
2019-04-08 19:33             ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-09 19:38               ` Rajat Jain
2019-04-05 20:35   ` [PATCH v3 3/3] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Instantiate pmc_core device on legacy platforms Rajat Jain
2019-04-08 17:07     ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-08 18:25       ` Rajat Jain
2019-04-08 18:02     ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj [this message]
2019-04-08 18:24       ` Rajat Jain
2019-04-08 16:51   ` [PATCH v3 1/3] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Convert to a platform_driver Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-08 18:42     ` Rajat Jain
2019-04-08 18:44       ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-08 18:47         ` Rajat Jain
2019-04-11  0:31 ` [PATCH v4 " Rajat Jain
2019-04-11  0:31   ` [PATCH v4 2/3] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Allow to dump debug registers on S0ix failure Rajat Jain
2019-04-11  0:31   ` [PATCH v4 3/3] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Instantiate pmc_core device on legacy platforms Rajat Jain
2019-04-11  0:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Convert to a platform_driver Rajat Jain
2019-04-11  0:37   ` [PATCH v5 2/3] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Allow to dump debug registers on S0ix failure Rajat Jain
2019-04-11 13:40     ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-17 23:04       ` Rajat Jain
2019-04-11  0:37   ` [PATCH v5 3/3] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Instantiate pmc_core device on legacy platforms Rajat Jain
2019-04-11 13:46     ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-17 23:05       ` Rajat Jain
2019-04-11 13:44   ` [PATCH v5 1/3] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Convert to a platform_driver Andy Shevchenko
2019-04-17 23:03     ` Rajat Jain
2019-04-17 23:01 ` [PATCH v6 " Rajat Jain
2019-04-17 23:01   ` [PATCH v6 2/3] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Allow to dump debug registers on S0ix failure Rajat Jain
2019-04-17 23:01   ` [PATCH v6 3/3] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Attach using APCI HID "INT33A1" Rajat Jain
2019-05-06  9:40     ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190408180202.GA769@raj-desk2.iind.intel.com \
    --to=rajneesh.bhardwaj@intel.com \
    --cc=Wysocki@google.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=evgreen@google.com \
    --cc=furquan@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rajatja@google.com \
    --cc=rajatxjain@gmail.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vishwanath.somayaji@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome