From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9182FC10F0E for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 17:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5DE2084F for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 17:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726565AbfDIRXW (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:23:22 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:51817 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726396AbfDIRXW (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:23:22 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id A9F2B68B02; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:23:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:23:09 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Robin Murphy Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Joerg Roedel , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Tom Lendacky , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/21] dma-iommu: move the arm64 wrappers to common code Message-ID: <20190409172309.GD14679@lst.de> References: <20190327080448.5500-1-hch@lst.de> <20190327080448.5500-8-hch@lst.de> <67573dd3-72c7-692d-bc1a-7edb49ff9551@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <67573dd3-72c7-692d-bc1a-7edb49ff9551@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:07:02PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: >> -static inline int iommu_dma_init(void) >> +static inline void iommu_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, >> + u64 size, const struct iommu_ops *ops) >> { >> - return 0; >> } > > I don't think it makes sense to have a stub for that - AFAICS it should > only ever be called form arch code with an inherent "select IOMMU_DMA" > (much like the stuff which isn't stubbed currently). > > Otherwise, I'm about 97% sure the rest of the move looks OK - thanks for > splitting things up. arm64 only selects IOMMU_DMA if IOMMU_SUPPORT is selected, which can be disabled. So to keep some (unusual) arm64 configs compiling we'll need the stub..