From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
carlos <carlos@redhat.com>,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, richard.earnshaw@arm.com
Subject: Re: rseq/arm32: choosing rseq code signature
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:42:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190411164219.GE29081@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1933578130.3292.1554928159928.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Hi Mathieu,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 04:29:19PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> ----- On Apr 9, 2019, at 3:32 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com wrote:
> > We are about to include the code signature required prior to restartable
> > sequences abort handlers into glibc, which will make this ABI choice final.
> > We need architecture maintainer input on that signature value.
> >
> > That code signature is placed before each abort handler, so the kernel can
> > validate that it is indeed jumping to an abort handler (and not some
> > arbitrary attacker-chosen code). The signature is never executed.
> >
> > The current discussion thread on the glibc mailing list leads us towards
> > using a trap with uncommon immediate operand, which simplifies integration
> > with disassemblers, emulators, makes it easier to debug if the control
> > flow gets redirected there by mistake, and is nicer for some architecture's
> > speculative execution.
> >
> > We can have different signatures for each sub-architecture, as long as they
> > don't have to co-exist within the same process. We can special-case with
> > #ifdef for each sub-architecture and endianness if need be. If the architecture
> > has instruction set extensions that can co-exist with the architecture
> > instruction set within the same process (e.g. thumb for arm), we need to take
> > into account to which instruction the chosen signature value would map (and
> > possibly decide if we need to extend rseq to support many signatures).
> >
> > Here is an example of rseq signature definition template:
> >
> > /*
> > * TODO: document trap instruction objdump output on each sub-architecture
> > * instruction sets, as well as instruction set extensions.
> > */
> > #define RSEQ_SIG 0x########
> >
> > Ideally we'd need a patch on top of the Linux kernel
> > tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-arm.h file that updates
> > the signature value, so I can then pick it up for the glibc
> > patchset.
>
> Would the following diff work for you ? If so, can I get your
> acked-by ?
I had a quick chat with Richard and Peter (CC'd), since they're much more
familiar with the A32 instruction set than I am and also have a better view
of what might already be in use.
Peter suggests that anything of the form 0xe7fxdefx should trap in both A32
and T32, although it does assemble to UDF; B <imm11> in T16. I'm not sure we
should get too obsessed with trying to encode a signature that universally
decodes to a trap.
Whatever you choose, it would be worth checking that it doesn't clash with
other allocations such as software breakpoints in GDB.
Will
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-arm.h b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-arm.h
> index 5f262c54364f..1f261ad2ac1b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-arm.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-arm.h
> @@ -5,7 +5,17 @@
> * (C) Copyright 2016-2018 - Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> */
>
> -#define RSEQ_SIG 0x53053053
> +/*
> + * RSEQ_SIG uses the udf A32 instruction with an uncommon immediate operand
> + * value 0x5305. This traps if user-space reaches this instruction by mistake,
> + * and the uncommon operand ensures the kernel does not move the instruction
> + * pointer to attacker-controlled code on rseq abort.
> + *
> + * The instruction pattern is:
> + *
> + * e7f530f5 udf #21253 ; 0x5305
> + */
> +#define RSEQ_SIG 0xe7f530f5
>
> #define rseq_smp_mb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("dmb" ::: "memory", "cc")
> #define rseq_smp_rmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("dmb" ::: "memory", "cc")
> @@ -78,7 +88,8 @@ do { \
> __rseq_str(table_label) ":\n\t" \
> ".word " __rseq_str(version) ", " __rseq_str(flags) "\n\t" \
> ".word " __rseq_str(start_ip) ", 0x0, " __rseq_str(post_commit_offset) ", 0x0, " __rseq_str(abort_ip) ", 0x0\n\t" \
> - ".word " __rseq_str(RSEQ_SIG) "\n\t" \
> + ".arm\n\t" \
> + ".inst " __rseq_str(RSEQ_SIG) "\n\t" \
> __rseq_str(label) ":\n\t" \
> teardown \
> "b %l[" __rseq_str(abort_label) "]\n\t"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-11 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-09 19:32 Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-04-10 20:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-04-11 16:42 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-04-11 17:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-04-11 19:55 ` Peter Maydell
2019-04-15 13:11 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-04-15 13:30 ` Peter Maydell
2019-04-15 13:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-04-16 13:39 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-04-17 10:37 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2019-04-17 14:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-04-17 15:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-04-18 16:18 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2019-04-11 12:24 ` Florian Weimer
2019-04-15 13:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190411164219.GE29081@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=richard.earnshaw@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®