From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2246C10F0E for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 04:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8A32086D for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 04:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726865AbfDLEkm (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:40:42 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:39582 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725788AbfDLEkm (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:40:42 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 85F2AC13FD584A7EEAF6; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:40:38 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.113.133) by DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:40:28 +0800 From: Wang Hai To: , , , , , , , , , , , CC: , , Subject: [PATCH 0/2] net-sysfs: revert wrong bugfix and re-fix Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 16:36:32 -0400 Message-ID: <20190412203634.30392-1-wanghai26@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.175.113.133] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org First patch reverts the bugfix which cause another issue. Reported by syzbot+6024817a931b2830bc93@syzkaller.appspotmail.com. See https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1737671b200000 for details Second patch improves the first(reverted) patch. Applied these two patches. I tested, the memory leak issue wasn't reproduced, and it didn't produce the bug which reported by syzkaller. Wang Hai (2): Revert "net-sysfs: Fix memory leak in netdev_register_kobject" net-sysfs: Fix memory leak in netdev_register_kobject net/core/net-sysfs.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 1.8.3.1