mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <chao@kernel.org>,
	Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/13] f2fs: fix to do sanity check on valid block count of segment
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 15:30:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190415073054.2577-2-yuchao0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190415073054.2577-1-yuchao0@huawei.com>

As Jungyeon reported in bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203233

- Overview
When mounting the attached crafted image and running program, following errors are reported.
Additionally, it hangs on sync after running program.

The image is intentionally fuzzed from a normal f2fs image for testing.
Compile options for F2FS are as follows.
CONFIG_F2FS_FS=y
CONFIG_F2FS_STAT_FS=y
CONFIG_F2FS_FS_XATTR=y
CONFIG_F2FS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS=y

- Reproduces
cc poc_13.c
mkdir test
mount -t f2fs tmp.img test
cp a.out test
cd test
sudo ./a.out
sync

- Kernel messages
 F2FS-fs (sdb): Bitmap was wrongly set, blk:4608
 kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2102!
 RIP: 0010:update_sit_entry+0x394/0x410
 Call Trace:
  f2fs_allocate_data_block+0x16f/0x660
  do_write_page+0x62/0x170
  f2fs_do_write_node_page+0x33/0xa0
  __write_node_page+0x270/0x4e0
  f2fs_sync_node_pages+0x5df/0x670
  f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x372/0x1400
  f2fs_sync_fs+0xa3/0x130
  f2fs_do_sync_file+0x1a6/0x810
  do_fsync+0x33/0x60
  __x64_sys_fsync+0xb/0x10
  do_syscall_64+0x43/0xf0
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

sit.vblocks and sum valid block count in sit.valid_map may be
inconsistent, segment w/ zero vblocks will be treated as free
segment, while allocating in free segment, we may allocate a
free block, if its bitmap is valid previously, it can cause
kernel crash due to bitmap verification failure.

Anyway, to avoid further serious metadata inconsistence and
corruption, it is necessary and worth to detect SIT
inconsistence. So let's enable check_block_count() to verify
vblocks and valid_map all the time rather than do it only
CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS is enabled.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/segment.h | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
index b333ecca6ed6..429007b8036e 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
@@ -673,7 +673,6 @@ static inline void verify_fio_blkaddr(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
 static inline int check_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 		int segno, struct f2fs_sit_entry *raw_sit)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
 	bool is_valid  = test_bit_le(0, raw_sit->valid_map) ? true : false;
 	int valid_blocks = 0;
 	int cur_pos = 0, next_pos;
@@ -700,7 +699,7 @@ static inline int check_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-#endif
+
 	/* check segment usage, and check boundary of a given segment number */
 	if (unlikely(GET_SIT_VBLOCKS(raw_sit) > sbi->blocks_per_seg
 					|| segno > TOTAL_SEGS(sbi) - 1)) {
-- 
2.18.0.rc1


  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-15  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-15  7:30 [PATCH 09/13] f2fs: fix to do sanity check on valid node/block count Chao Yu
2019-04-15  7:30 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2019-04-15  7:30 ` [PATCH 11/13] f2fs: fix to avoid panic in f2fs_inplace_write_data() Chao Yu
2019-04-15  7:30 ` [PATCH 12/13] f2fs: fix to set FI_UPDATE_WRITE correctly Chao Yu
2019-04-15  7:30 ` [PATCH 13/13] f2fs: don't recovery orphan inode on readonly device Chao Yu
2019-04-15  8:10   ` [f2fs-dev] " Ju Hyung Park
2019-04-15  8:56     ` Chao Yu
2019-04-15 11:04       ` Ju Hyung Park
2019-04-15 11:31         ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190415073054.2577-2-yuchao0@huawei.com \
    --to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®