From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=WRlz=SV=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169CDC282DF
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:27:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8233222CC
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 18:26:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727742AbfDSS0w (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:26:52 -0400
Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:9990 "EHLO mga04.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1727518AbfDSS0m (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:26:42 -0400
X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN
X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51])
  by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Apr 2019 09:51:39 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,370,1549958400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="137202297"
Received: from alison-desk.jf.intel.com ([10.54.74.53])
  by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Apr 2019 09:51:39 -0700
Date:   Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:54:35 -0700
From:   Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc:     Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
        "Schmauss, Erik" <erik.schmauss@intel.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi/hmat: Update acpi_hmat_type enum with
 ACPI_HMAT_TYPE_PROXIMITY
Message-ID: <20190419165435.GA2284@alison-desk.jf.intel.com>
References: <20190417181310.27613-1-alison.schofield@intel.com>
 <20190418145640.GA7659@localhost.localdomain>
 <CAJZ5v0g1EZbzr6BJhVBVb8JZGnVQg2Sz8NHtz_0Ji9R_58wMbA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0g1EZbzr6BJhVBVb8JZGnVQg2Sz8NHtz_0Ji9R_58wMbA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:07:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 5:02 PM Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:13:10AM -0700, Alison Schofield wrote:
> > > ACPI 6.3 changed the subtable "Memory Subsystem Address Range Structure"
> > > to "Memory Proximity Domain Attributes Structure".
> > >
> > > Updating and renaming of the structure was included in commit:
> > > ACPICA: ACPI 6.3: HMAT updates (9a8d961f1ef835b0d338fbe13da03cb424e87ae5)
> >
> > I was not really happy with that HMAT update. Platforms implementing
> > 6.2's HMAT continue to exist even if 6.3 isn't backward compatible. We
> > just lost the original subtable definition.
> 
> Well, that's true, sadly, but the question is what to do in the kernel.
> 
> Definitely, the 6.3 format needs to be supported, but if the 6.2 ships
> anywhere in practice, that will need to be supported too.

So, what's the usual practice when ACPI tables are updated?
Do we define separate 6.2 and 6.3 versions of this subtable and let
the kernel figure out which one its looking at?