From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BFDC43219 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FAF21670 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728185AbfD3Mzh (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Apr 2019 08:55:37 -0400 Received: from 178.115.242.59.static.drei.at ([178.115.242.59]:33586 "EHLO mail.osadl.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727036AbfD3Mzh (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Apr 2019 08:55:37 -0400 Received: by mail.osadl.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 756C05C1015; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:54:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:54:44 +0200 From: Nicholas Mc Guire To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Nicholas Mc Guire , Santosh Shilimkar , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] rds: ib: force endiannes annotation Message-ID: <20190430125444.GB26274@osadl.at> References: <1556593977-15828-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org> <20190430114321.GA9813@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190430114321.GA9813@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 04:43:21AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The patch looks good, but the force in the subject sounds weird now. True - but last time I renamed the subject when seindg a V2 I wsa told not to do that - the rational was if I rename it and call it V2 -then there is no V1... If thats nonsense - then I'll resend with a new commit subject thx! hofrat