From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
jdike@addtoit.com, Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>,
Haibo Xu <haibo.xu@arm.com>, Bin Lu <bin.lu@arm.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: ptrace: add support for syscall emulation
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:05:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190430170520.29470-5-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190430170520.29470-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Add PTRACE_SYSEMU and PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP support on arm64.
We don't need any special handling for PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP.
It's quite difficult to generalize handling PTRACE_SYSEMU cross
architectures and avoid calls to tracehook_report_syscall_entry twice.
Different architecture have different mechanism to indicate NO_SYSCALL
and trying to generalise adds more code for no gain.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 5 ++++-
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Hi Will,
While I agree with your idea of consolidation of PTRACE_SYSEMU handling
to core, it's quite a lot of change to do that, though it may be simple
and confusing with indirection from arch code to core.
Regards,
Sudeep
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
index eb3ef73e07cf..c285d1ce7186 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk);
* TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE - syscall trace active
* TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT - syscall tracepoint for ftrace
* TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT - syscall auditing
+ * TIF_SYSCALL_EMU - syscall emulation active
* TIF_SECOMP - syscall secure computing
* TIF_SIGPENDING - signal pending
* TIF_NEED_RESCHED - rescheduling necessary
@@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk);
#define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT 9
#define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT 10
#define TIF_SECCOMP 11
+#define TIF_SYSCALL_EMU 12
#define TIF_MEMDIE 18 /* is terminating due to OOM killer */
#define TIF_FREEZE 19
#define TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK 20
@@ -109,6 +111,7 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk);
#define _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT (1 << TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT)
#define _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT (1 << TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)
#define _TIF_SECCOMP (1 << TIF_SECCOMP)
+#define _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU (1 << TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)
#define _TIF_UPROBE (1 << TIF_UPROBE)
#define _TIF_FSCHECK (1 << TIF_FSCHECK)
#define _TIF_32BIT (1 << TIF_32BIT)
@@ -120,7 +123,7 @@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk);
#define _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK (_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT | \
_TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT | _TIF_SECCOMP | \
- _TIF_NOHZ)
+ _TIF_NOHZ | _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)
#define INIT_THREAD_INFO(tsk) \
{ \
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
index b82e0a9b3da3..9353355cb91a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -1819,8 +1819,12 @@ static void tracehook_report_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs,
int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE))
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE) ||
+ test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) {
tracehook_report_syscall(regs, PTRACE_SYSCALL_ENTER);
+ if (!in_syscall(regs) || test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU))
+ return -1;
+ }
/* Do the secure computing after ptrace; failures should be fast. */
if (secure_computing(NULL) == -1)
--
2.17.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-30 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-30 17:05 [PATCH v3 0/4] ptrace: cleanup PTRACE_SYSEMU handling and add support for arm64 Sudeep Holla
2019-04-30 17:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] ptrace: move clearing of TIF_SYSCALL_EMU flag to core Sudeep Holla
2019-05-01 16:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-01 16:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-02 16:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-02 16:45 ` Will Deacon
2019-05-03 14:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-04-30 17:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] x86: simplify _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling Sudeep Holla
2019-05-01 16:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-04-30 17:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: add PTRACE_SYSEMU{,SINGLESTEP} definations to uapi headers Sudeep Holla
2019-04-30 17:05 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190430170520.29470-5-sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
--cc=bin.lu@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=haibo.xu@arm.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®