From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B5EC43219 for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 06:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696AD2075E for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 06:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726705AbfECGeg (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2019 02:34:36 -0400 Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:49428 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725775AbfECGef (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2019 02:34:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E411F453; Fri, 3 May 2019 06:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 06:34:35 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Deepa Dinamani Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, omar.kilani@gmail.com, jbaron@akamai.com, arnd@arndb.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask() Message-ID: <20190503063435.446aqcckbc6ri7xx@dcvr> References: <20190503033440.cow6xm4p4hezgkxv@linux-r8p5> <20190503034205.12121-1-deepa.kernel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190503034205.12121-1-deepa.kernel@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Deepa Dinamani wrote: > Sorry, I was trying a new setup at work. I should have tested it. > My bad, I've checked this one. Thanks. This is good w.r.t. epoll_pwait and ppoll when applied to 5.0.11 (no fs/io_uring.c). Can't think of anything which uses pselect or aio on my system; but it looks right to me. > I've removed the questionable reported-by, since we're not sure if > it is actually the same issue. Yes, I hope Omar can test this, too. Thanks again, all!