From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E24FC04AB3 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 17:38:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF31121019 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 17:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="QtGxLGHC" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726858AbfEIRiN (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 May 2019 13:38:13 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f195.google.com ([209.85.215.195]:33533 "EHLO mail-pg1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726576AbfEIRiM (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 May 2019 13:38:12 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f195.google.com with SMTP id h17so1577289pgv.0; Thu, 09 May 2019 10:38:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=f4d+zUvWSp076co/UEghpzeuE5XMvDzMZv9OPdz0Fho=; b=QtGxLGHCCuQdIzSY0pMaYXLV3vvrla34kJG+0exw7HANJF5fNMTfR7c2tr0Pd+Dyns 4M/h6TGxRyze6lnUWkYzRtH+5MhyVJyPy9qhrDYbIOQQdiQqo8LrYzHqy5hOVBY/e9jy km7kntmd3VcGjzMGCRLaKWZ25p1T5Wq6mqGZc3edVky021c8rRTojDC4oWEtYpigP1lr xQ0bE2IBUgnwgOLhbjGOQQyRI/g8hwnUFqewabqStZqHv+IWbJNGGHT6sI3Q1cd2hhIu HY06CyJ+mrzLjNiJIGhgEI/4vSIky9YIbtPmLerr9viJt+lYRsCcgjxfABrDthTBeDXl nifA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=f4d+zUvWSp076co/UEghpzeuE5XMvDzMZv9OPdz0Fho=; b=XPng5GOIRvanK8osBKBEXorvBs0eGDLX3HanGKYnGC+uE0tPMhyBh+FW5G0fCYD+71 HuFaArweaJEIFELR5Wj/2KW5w/KbLWBjAxPeDeq8K3HNEb91veBBus6PwAZ0zADEZhzd /5EpZ0abYl8fwfxAp0GXmNY34mjEclOPd5QxZPVWl1fywrEJNEP8cInb5LTmds0RzxR6 R35PtkKb1T01HOjuXteucCqlu/Y0KF0kUnHFPa9ew/4J7ey1+dXkFJtaEa+F4sLr8RyA 5MVdlDI/nq9T59SePZycvhI2Hg+PRIripZ0cL7ZwD44m0KoDiFlQ4beINL/nIaP4rgHl l7Zw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUREJi2l3qiU4jLzvVlq45mJm+8PKX3r1ebM8Ge/6iKjY4EXIkZ Fwa48P3tom4JjRyG3BMRKeayucUJ X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzyyS1q4NMHTanVzs6FfP0UL8mgF06W2JAoYOItAnnfh5+BodP+1E9ckk8girs+SvXD7oPq7w== X-Received: by 2002:a63:445d:: with SMTP id t29mr7225134pgk.303.1557423492126; Thu, 09 May 2019 10:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i22sm3612911pfa.127.2019.05.09.10.38.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 May 2019 10:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 10:38:09 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Ben Hutchings Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.16 00/10] 3.16.67-rc1 review Message-ID: <20190509173809.GA28365@roeck-us.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 03:08:16PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.67 release. > There are 10 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat May 11 14:08:16 UTC 2019. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 137 pass: 136 fail: 1 Failed builds: i386:tools/perf Qemu test results: total: 226 pass: 226 fail: 0 Thanks, Guenter