From: john.hubbard@gmail.com
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] lockdep: fix warning: print_lock_trace defined but not used
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 00:08:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190521070808.3536-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> (raw)
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Hi,
This is a second attempt to send this. The first attempt [1]
went via mailgw.nvidia.com, and did not receive a DKIM signature,
so I think it probably got discarded by many systems.
This one goes via gmail, which is what I was using before. We'll keep
working on getting the NVIDIA outgoing email servers working
with mailing lists, but meanwhile I'm back to using "envelope"
techniques, I guess. I was hoping to use a "native" email
address, but not quite there yet. :)
Anyway, here's the original cover letter:
I ran across this minor warning while building against today's linux.git.
The proposed trivial fix leaves it a little fragile from a "what if someone
adds a new call to print_lock_trace()" point of view, but I believe that it
makes the current combination of ifdefs accurate, anyway.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/19/60
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
John Hubbard (1):
lockdep: fix warning: print_lock_trace defined but not used
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--
2.21.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-05-21 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-21 7:08 john.hubbard [this message]
2019-05-21 7:08 ` [PATCH 1/1] " john.hubbard
2019-06-09 13:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-09 23:38 ` John Hubbard
2019-06-10 0:09 ` [PATCH v2] " john.hubbard
2019-06-18 16:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-05-19 6:29 [PATCH 0/1] " John Hubbard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190521070808.3536-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--to=john.hubbard@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome