From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87682C282CE for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 23:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40AFE206BA for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 23:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729483AbfEVXLt (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 19:11:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46976 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727691AbfEVXLt (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 19:11:49 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14AEA3084294; Wed, 22 May 2019 23:11:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from treble (ovpn-120-127.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.127]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 202731001284; Wed, 22 May 2019 23:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 18:11:46 -0500 From: Josh Poimboeuf To: Raphael Gault Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "peterz@infradead.org" , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Julien Thierry Subject: Re: [RFC V2 00/16] objtool: Add support for Arm64 Message-ID: <20190522231146.vw43gkah2npeouj3@treble> References: <20190516103655.5509-1-raphael.gault@arm.com> <20190516142917.nuhh6dmfiufxqzls@treble> <26692833-0e5b-cfe0-0ffd-c2c2f0815935@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <26692833-0e5b-cfe0-0ffd-c2c2f0815935@arm.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.40]); Wed, 22 May 2019 23:11:49 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:50:57PM +0000, Raphael Gault wrote: > Hi Josh, > > Thanks for offering your help and sorry for the late answer. > > My understanding is that a table of offsets is built by GCC, those > offsets being scaled by 4 before adding them to the base label. > I believe the offsets are stored in the .rodata section. To find the > size of that table, it is needed to find a comparison, which can be > optimized out apprently. In that case the end of the array can be found > by locating labels pointing to data behind it (which is not 100% safe). > > On 5/16/19 3:29 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 11:36:39AM +0100, Raphael Gault wrote: > >> Noteworthy points: > >> * I still haven't figured out how to detect switch-tables on arm64. I > >> have a better understanding of them but still haven't implemented checks > >> as it doesn't look trivial at all. > > > > Switch tables were tricky to get right on x86. If you share an example > > (or even just a .o file) I can take a look. Hopefully they're somewhat > > similar to x86 switch tables. Otherwise we may want to consider a > > different approach (for example maybe a GCC plugin could help annotate > > them). > > > > The case which made me realize the issue is the one of > arch/arm64/kernel/module.o:apply_relocate_add: > > ``` > What seems to happen in the case of module.o is: > 334: 90000015 adrp x21, 0 > which retrieves the location of an offset in the rodata section, and a > bit later we do some extra computation with it in order to compute the > jump destination: > 3e0: 78625aa0 ldrh w0, [x21, w2, uxtw #1] > 3e4: 10000061 adr x1, 3f0 > 3e8: 8b20a820 add x0, x1, w0, sxth #2 > 3ec: d61f0000 br x0 > ``` > > Please keep in mind that the actual offsets might vary. > > I'm happy to provide more details about what I have identified if you > want me to. Thanks. I'll try to take a deeper look. Were these patches based on tip/master? There were some minor conflicts in arch/arm64/Kconfig and arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile. I'm also getting a build failure on arm64: make[4]: *** No rule to make target '/root/linux/tools/objtool/arch/arm64/arch_special.o', needed by '/root/linux/tools/objtool/arch/arm64/objtool-in.o'. Stop It looks like arch/arm64/Build and arch/x86/Build are trying to build from arch_special.c which doesn't exist. -- Josh