From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
marc.zyngier@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, james.morse@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
liwei391@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: IRQ priority masking and Pseudo-NMI fixes
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 17:51:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523165151.GB1716@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1556553607-46531-1-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com>
Hi Julien,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 05:00:02PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> [Changing the title to make it reflex more the status of the series.]
>
> Version one[1] of this series attempted to fix the issue reported by
> Zenghui[2] when using the function_graph tracer with IRQ priority
> masking.
>
> Since then, I realized that priority masking and the use of Pseudo-NMIs
> was more broken than I thought.
Do you plan to respin this in light of Marc's comments?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-23 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-29 16:00 Julien Thierry
2019-04-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] arm64: Do not enable IRQs for ct_user_exit Julien Thierry
2019-04-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] arm64: Fix interrupt tracing in the presence of NMIs Julien Thierry
2019-04-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking Julien Thierry
2019-05-07 8:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-05-14 9:25 ` Julien Thierry
2019-05-14 12:01 ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-14 13:08 ` Julien Thierry
2019-04-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] arm64: irqflags: Introduce explicit debugging for IRQ priorities Julien Thierry
2019-05-07 8:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-05-16 13:43 ` Julien Thierry
2019-04-29 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: fix kernel stack overflow in kdump capture kernel Julien Thierry
2019-05-23 16:51 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-06-05 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: IRQ priority masking and Pseudo-NMI fixes Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190523165151.GB1716@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®