From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A03BC072B1 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 13:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2885C2133F for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 13:15:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1559049337; bh=nLKhjIzeaR1h6w2OEHXI4ENMxnKMi53HIQ3eeuO/2yQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=xk0MTxrWSZQgG3LVgo7u3ApB2v22yPHzDIXPLDwCzsK86Sy8rAl2p7nkq+Ny8diWb MhcQmFP+7q+2Ko5Yl6Z7XSRe7aZSz6FUbz6+cEW4xRpolGONwdagq0KQMh+UqEt2bW 0TnFdS7kf6rrvAQ9TUqAZC5NxXrLEqKaOcOHG3eY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727521AbfE1NPg (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2019 09:15:36 -0400 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:53090 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726620AbfE1NPg (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2019 09:15:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sirena.org.uk; s=20170815-heliosphere; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BblpOpFREi2nfI7PrhAnSrsLHFooqML/drjwmo5tWZw=; b=ccqw3W6F00V3/DVzf6rsqL1qw unZI8FfF9dGo5mfzG31+24CCFTPT/z8Jv2dEJx7l9maiaMOoW3VDlw55OB++aE7jsLHZ1FrsYbjcl Uuyvx6Qrz/vomXuypGN9VLvd7LpNThJ/gfXFMZ66Q7dLNfGUVV8eo3XI1zpECkHO7XjUI=; Received: from cpc102320-sgyl38-2-0-cust46.18-2.cable.virginm.net ([82.37.168.47] helo=finisterre.sirena.org.uk) by heliosphere.sirena.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hVbwY-0002T8-2f; Tue, 28 May 2019 13:15:06 +0000 Received: by finisterre.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E733440046; Tue, 28 May 2019 14:15:04 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 14:15:04 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Linus Walleij Cc: Guillaume Tucker , Geert Uytterhoeven , Elaine Zhang , Eduardo Valentin , Daniel Lezcano , Heiko Stuebner , Tomeu Vizoso , Linux PM list , Kevin Hilman , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Matt Hart , mgalka@collabora.com, Enric Balletbo i Serra , Zhang Rui , Linux ARM Subject: Re: linusw/for-next boot bisection: v5.2-rc1-8-g73a790c68d7e on rk3288-veyron-jaq Message-ID: <20190528131504.GI2456@sirena.org.uk> References: <5cec74e8.1c69fb81.37335.9d7b@mx.google.com> <0edab48f-06e5-9ed8-09be-7c9976ae1afb@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G3juXO9GfR42w+sw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: The other line moves faster. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --G3juXO9GfR42w+sw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:45:13AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:36 AM Guillaume Tucker > > Not really, so I've disabled bisections in the linux-gpio tree > > and a few other maintainers' trees for now. I'll see if we can > > come up with a more systematic way of suppressing bisections in > > similar cases (i.e. the issue has been fixed in mainline later > > than the base commit for the branch being tested). > I think this is what the zeroday autobuilder does because > they never seem to show this problem. Thanks for looking > into it! I've got a feeling they do this by deduping after doing the bisection; they also used to have a system where they'd merge a bunch of trees together and do the bisect on that to save repeating bisects. --G3juXO9GfR42w+sw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlztNFQACgkQJNaLcl1U h9CnRwf/ee3CvNVsnpAeOOZn7++IRM1ltd0gFGJR8JS1aeptgeYX4Iy+LiyjV8CO ocs2H9W1CPO8oNd45rV709U1T5MzUpy8dPN306+3dPtB+etG8MXvBGSfoSx3oX0t wCZJaDgS/eakIS3nyhwsm4kYrFbOmG8hEjN22pcXugB6++1JPKXDQEC6bVxdJUVo meiYp9AR6PrYDDALwLSw+Hr5PJxOchP/x0azRWqDQ8xqICHaNkhYo2kV1uTF2nBg Y83I4nrNv4JOj+BSH+52Bys+uA8lT2daypGmuX3LVB/mILWA22w9R4uogPNk5uEg hcNuHlAgis5PMVLlC8S8D6U3j4wUIw== =/CjW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G3juXO9GfR42w+sw--