From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, jiri@mellanox.com,
jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, antoine.tenart@bootlin.com,
thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ethtool: Check for vlan etype or vlan tci when parsing flow_rule
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 15:05:58 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190530.150558.1424400488308311629.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190530140840.741-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 16:08:40 +0200
> When parsing an ethtool flow spec to build a flow_rule, the code checks
> if both the vlan etype and the vlan tci are specified by the user to add
> a FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_VLAN match.
>
> However, when the user only specified a vlan etype or a vlan tci, this
> check silently ignores these parameters.
>
> For example, the following rule :
>
> ethtool -N eth0 flow-type udp4 vlan 0x0010 action -1 loc 0
>
> will result in no error being issued, but the equivalent rule will be
> created and passed to the NIC driver :
>
> ethtool -N eth0 flow-type udp4 action -1 loc 0
>
> In the end, neither the NIC driver using the rule nor the end user have
> a way to know that these keys were dropped along the way, or that
> incorrect parameters were entered.
>
> This kind of check should be left to either the driver, or the ethtool
> flow spec layer.
>
> This commit makes so that ethtool parameters are forwarded as-is to the
> NIC driver.
>
> Since none of the users of ethtool_rx_flow_rule_create are using the
> VLAN dissector, I don't think this qualifies as a regression.
>
> Fixes: eca4205f9ec3 ("ethtool: add ethtool_rx_flow_spec to flow_rule structure translator")
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Applied, thank you.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-30 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-30 14:08 Maxime Chevallier
2019-05-30 14:09 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-05-30 22:05 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190530.150558.1424400488308311629.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=antoine.tenart@bootlin.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®