From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, mhocko@suse.com,
ira.weiny@intel.com, david@redhat.com, cai@lca.pw,
logang@deltatee.com, james.morse@arm.com, cpandya@codeaurora.org,
arunks@codeaurora.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, osalvador@suse.de,
ard.biesheuvel@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] arm64/mm: Hold memory hotplug lock while walking for kernel page table dump
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 11:42:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190530104203.GC56046@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1559121387-674-3-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:46:26PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> The arm64 page table dump code can race with concurrent modification of the
> kernel page tables. When a leaf entries are modified concurrently, the dump
> code may log stale or inconsistent information for a VA range, but this is
> otherwise not harmful.
>
> When intermediate levels of table are freed, the dump code will continue to
> use memory which has been freed and potentially reallocated for another
> purpose. In such cases, the dump code may dereference bogus addresses,
> leading to a number of potential problems.
>
> Intermediate levels of table may by freed during memory hot-remove,
> which will be enabled by a subsequent patch. To avoid racing with
> this, take the memory hotplug lock when walking the kernel page table.
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/ptdump_debugfs.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/ptdump_debugfs.c b/arch/arm64/mm/ptdump_debugfs.c
> index 064163f..80171d1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/ptdump_debugfs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/ptdump_debugfs.c
> @@ -7,7 +7,10 @@
> static int ptdump_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> {
> struct ptdump_info *info = m->private;
> +
> + get_online_mems();
> ptdump_walk_pgd(m, info);
> + put_online_mems();
We need to explicitly include <linux/memory_hotplug.h> to get the
prototypes of {get,put}_online_mems().
With that fixed up:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
I understand from [1] that Michal is ok with using these here, and we're
open to reworking this if/when the hotplug locking is changed.
Mark.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527072001.GB1658@dhcp22.suse.cz
> return 0;
> }
> DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(ptdump);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-30 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-29 9:16 [PATCH V5 0/3] arm64/mm: Enable memory hot remove Anshuman Khandual
2019-05-29 9:16 ` [PATCH V5 1/3] mm/hotplug: Reorder arch_remove_memory() call in __remove_memory() Anshuman Khandual
2019-05-30 10:37 ` Mark Rutland
2019-06-07 2:28 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-06-07 7:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-06-11 11:26 ` [PATCH V5 - Rebased] mm/hotplug: Reorder memblock_[free|remove]() calls in try_remove_memory() Anshuman Khandual
2019-06-11 22:19 ` Andrew Morton
2019-06-12 4:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-06-12 6:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-06-13 1:54 ` Andrew Morton
2019-06-13 5:37 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-06-13 6:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-29 9:16 ` [PATCH V5 2/3] arm64/mm: Hold memory hotplug lock while walking for kernel page table dump Anshuman Khandual
2019-05-30 10:42 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2019-05-29 9:16 ` [PATCH V5 3/3] arm64/mm: Enable memory hot remove Anshuman Khandual
2019-05-30 15:12 ` Mark Rutland
2019-06-11 14:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-05-29 22:06 ` [PATCH V5 0/3] " Andrew Morton
2019-05-30 4:23 ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-05-30 7:23 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190530104203.GC56046@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@arm.com \
--cc=arunks@codeaurora.org \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cpandya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®