From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB4EC28CC1 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 13:25:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCD827399 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 13:25:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1559395523; bh=yaP2hH6CpFvO7MSIngyl9hWVZPMdRMnYHGCQ+0vGdPE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=1HcTDuCBJv1JYsa8q67RdpN8LlyLs7BtRxlVhOWeknOYbtd9RLOKQHAMwmlMMW//U /4mQhTDUoZdP8BzoY53SCiTglz1Rfmc9AVViMvJwU6oueidhjo4AUAyXavm8SBIKb/ bjLv8Air9O3z5rnokKGPIQh2wXli/vopcro3494k= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729448AbfFANZW (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Jun 2019 09:25:22 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55536 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729437AbfFANZS (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Jun 2019 09:25:18 -0400 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD4512739B; Sat, 1 Jun 2019 13:25:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1559395517; bh=yaP2hH6CpFvO7MSIngyl9hWVZPMdRMnYHGCQ+0vGdPE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=l6r+31vsTtPoxXz+ZE2x/6JyaHv8CWtW63wMRyBuvvYyRJJy2KdYZsu25qOQ9Zw7g uJbWDuyqdTKSYQZXhXsgTjiow8VbC3G3LgKkLTkuqtMLxHm8DFAPiAu+tG8DDh+x2b +74Y9F6kIOqfoqh0YeQzTrmH9vpnO1xaOBhYqIDY= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mike Kravetz , Naoya Horiguchi , Davidlohr Bueso , Joonsoo Kim , Michal Hocko , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Sasha Levin , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 06/74] hugetlbfs: on restore reserve error path retain subpool reservation Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 09:23:53 -0400 Message-Id: <20190601132501.27021-6-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190601132501.27021-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20190601132501.27021-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Mike Kravetz [ Upstream commit 0919e1b69ab459e06df45d3ba6658d281962db80 ] When a huge page is allocated, PagePrivate() is set if the allocation consumed a reservation. When freeing a huge page, PagePrivate is checked. If set, it indicates the reservation should be restored. PagePrivate being set at free huge page time mostly happens on error paths. When huge page reservations are created, a check is made to determine if the mapping is associated with an explicitly mounted filesystem. If so, pages are also reserved within the filesystem. The default action when freeing a huge page is to decrement the usage count in any associated explicitly mounted filesystem. However, if the reservation is to be restored the reservation/use count within the filesystem should not be decrementd. Otherwise, a subsequent page allocation and free for the same mapping location will cause the file filesystem usage to go 'negative'. Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on nodev 4.0G -4.0M 4.1G - /opt/hugepool To fix, when freeing a huge page do not adjust filesystem usage if PagePrivate() is set to indicate the reservation should be restored. I did not cc stable as the problem has been around since reserves were added to hugetlbfs and nobody has noticed. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190328234704.27083-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi Cc: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- mm/hugetlb.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index 8b682da98d95b..6d40bd1759cf2 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -1247,12 +1247,23 @@ void free_huge_page(struct page *page) ClearPagePrivate(page); /* - * A return code of zero implies that the subpool will be under its - * minimum size if the reservation is not restored after page is free. - * Therefore, force restore_reserve operation. + * If PagePrivate() was set on page, page allocation consumed a + * reservation. If the page was associated with a subpool, there + * would have been a page reserved in the subpool before allocation + * via hugepage_subpool_get_pages(). Since we are 'restoring' the + * reservtion, do not call hugepage_subpool_put_pages() as this will + * remove the reserved page from the subpool. */ - if (hugepage_subpool_put_pages(spool, 1) == 0) - restore_reserve = true; + if (!restore_reserve) { + /* + * A return code of zero implies that the subpool will be + * under its minimum size if the reservation is not restored + * after page is free. Therefore, force restore_reserve + * operation. + */ + if (hugepage_subpool_put_pages(spool, 1) == 0) + restore_reserve = true; + } spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock); clear_page_huge_active(page); -- 2.20.1