From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CBFC282CE for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FB1206E0 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727727AbfFDNCW (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:02:22 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:5114 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727700AbfFDNCT (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:02:19 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Jun 2019 06:02:19 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from ahunter-desktop.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.198]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2019 06:02:17 -0700 From: Adrian Hunter To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa , Jin Yao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 17/19] perf time-utils: Make perf_time__parse_for_ranges() more logical Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 16:00:15 +0300 Message-Id: <20190604130017.31207-18-adrian.hunter@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190604130017.31207-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com> References: <20190604130017.31207-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Explicit time ranges never contain a percent sign whereas percentage ranges always do, so it is possible to call the correct parser. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter --- tools/perf/util/time-utils.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c index 9a463752dba8..d942840356e3 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c @@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str, struct perf_time_interval **ranges, int *range_size, int *range_num) { + bool has_percent = strchr(time_str, '%'); struct perf_time_interval *ptime_range; int size, num, ret = -EINVAL; @@ -409,7 +410,7 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str, if (!ptime_range) return -ENOMEM; - if (perf_time__parse_str(ptime_range, time_str) != 0) { + if (has_percent) { if (session->evlist->first_sample_time == 0 && session->evlist->last_sample_time == 0) { pr_err("HINT: no first/last sample time found in perf data.\n" @@ -427,6 +428,8 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str, if (num < 0) goto error_invalid; } else { + if (perf_time__parse_str(ptime_range, time_str)) + goto error_invalid; num = 1; } -- 2.17.1