From: Gen Zhang <blackgod016574@gmail.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
agk@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dm-region-hash: Fix a missing-check bug in __rh_alloc()
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 22:58:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190605145820.GA3465@zhanggen-UX430UQ> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190605122159.GA32538@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 08:21:59AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05 2019 at 2:05am -0400,
> Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> > On 24. 05. 19, 5:12, Gen Zhang wrote:
> > > In function __rh_alloc(), the pointer nreg is allocated a memory space
> > > via kmalloc(). And it is used in the following codes. However, when
> > > there is a memory allocation error, kmalloc() fails. Thus null pointer
> > > dereference may happen. And it will cause the kernel to crash. Therefore,
> > > we should check the return value and handle the error.
> > > Further, in __rh_find(), we should also check the return value and
> > > handle the error.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gen Zhang <blackgod016574@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > ---
> > > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-region-hash.c b/drivers/md/dm-region-hash.c
> > > index 1f76045..2fa1641 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/md/dm-region-hash.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-region-hash.c
> > > @@ -290,8 +290,11 @@ static struct dm_region *__rh_alloc(struct dm_region_hash *rh, region_t region)
> > > struct dm_region *reg, *nreg;
> > >
> > > nreg = mempool_alloc(&rh->region_pool, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > > - if (unlikely(!nreg))
> > > + if (unlikely(!nreg)) {
> > > nreg = kmalloc(sizeof(*nreg), GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> > > + if (!nreg)
> > > + return NULL;
> >
> > What's the purpose of checking NO_FAIL allocations?
>
> There isn't, that was already pointed out in a different thread for this
> same patch (think patch was posted twice):
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2019-May/msg00124.html
>
> Mike
Thanks for your reply. The first thread is not replied for a period, so
the second one is posted. But I don't know why Jiri replied to the first
thread.
Thanks
Gen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-05 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-24 3:12 [PATCH] " Gen Zhang
2019-06-05 6:05 ` Jiri Slaby
2019-06-05 12:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2019-06-05 14:58 ` Gen Zhang [this message]
2019-05-27 0:50 [PATCH] dm-region-hash: fix " Gen Zhang
2019-05-27 1:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2019-05-27 3:12 ` Gen Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190605145820.GA3465@zhanggen-UX430UQ \
--to=blackgod016574@gmail.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®