From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B939C04AB5 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 07:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5428720673 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 07:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="Rw+EH+Nx" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726716AbfFFHdn (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2019 03:33:43 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:56284 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725782AbfFFHdn (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2019 03:33:43 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F1EFA008DFA61B32E935F4C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f1e:fa00:8dfa:61b3:2e93:5f4c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 10CC01EC0997; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 09:33:42 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1559806422; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=oDuZcljZ6XPfPpxNTNWHMC/JG/+jzdqwlSZ4IwPbjkI=; b=Rw+EH+Nxh1cToJX0wiYHeUl9ZoruJkvobehk/I31YYZaBe4pIVlrbwWap/Xfj0t/FGcXXF FPx4WpfAFA7iDIRBgnoSqNLHGwgNfVVsh4VfD/Bd6YFbDLM472uR4v0k643kfL9HaGmKeK bcz6lfkC4vTd3eNYiSfbJZjDIYJaZ8E= Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 09:33:37 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" Cc: "kan.liang@linux.intel.com" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "Luck, Tony" , "Zhang, Rui" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/CPU: Add more Icelake model number Message-ID: <20190606073336.GB26146@zn.tnic> References: <20190603134122.13853-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> <20190606063525.GA26146@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 07:13:18AM +0000, Zhuo, Qiuxu wrote: > During internal co-work, based on Kan's original patch, I got the > "#define" in the Ice Lake group sorted by model number(the header of > the file requires the sorting) and added my SOB. Dropping my SOB or > adding a text "[Qiuxu: Get the macros in the Ice Lake group sorted > by model number.]" at the end of the commit message - which one is > better/clear for you? I'll add that note when applying. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.