From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD3AC28CC7 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 12:18:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB70E20820 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 12:18:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389827AbfFJMSs (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:18:48 -0400 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:52548 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388833AbfFJMSr (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 08:18:47 -0400 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB2EB80CD; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 12:19:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 05:18:43 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Yue Haibing Cc: paul@pwsan.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ARM: OMAP2+: Make some variables static Message-ID: <20190610121843.GY5447@atomide.com> References: <20190413141744.34488-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190413141744.34488-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, * Yue Haibing [190413 07:18]: > From: YueHaibing > > Fix sparse warnings: > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_43xx_ipblock_data.c:532:25: warning: symbol 'am33xx_gpio_hwmod_class' was not declared. Should it be static? > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_43xx_ipblock_data.c:542:19: warning: symbol 'am33xx_gpio1_hwmod' was not declared. Should it be static? > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_43xx_ipblock_data.c:562:19: warning: symbol 'am33xx_gpio2_hwmod' was not declared. Should it be static? > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_43xx_ipblock_data.c:582:19: warning: symbol 'am33xx_gpio3_hwmod' was not declared. Should it be static? I just noticed this is still pending, sorry for the delay. Applying into omap-for-v5.3/soc. Regards, Tony