From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B70C43218 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 21:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A225920859 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 21:21:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1560201696; bh=gk2LT6fcQsSzPtvSDO++ABbQbp8Uy6r4UjS6ey/0Juc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=mvYP0spDmTnwlRcNz5UsT7EBMnYC+bpME4MYyGOv8tI0r02LjyLUDJWtpx55mNXFB E3gL1wyfTXlmky5qrBf214vpZet/QdbKQpjni42wm5i/MRpKChh9N0gt35UfPJ0Ot3 3ilSQ3yA0j3xT6R+mrF7C3itLMg6ZaHUXjQey5Nc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390448AbfFJVVg (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:21:36 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40280 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390072AbfFJVUf (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:20:35 -0400 Received: from akpm3.svl.corp.google.com (unknown [104.133.8.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 253C220859; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 21:20:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1560201634; bh=gk2LT6fcQsSzPtvSDO++ABbQbp8Uy6r4UjS6ey/0Juc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=K33EzM6D4Va30ZI5NAiOD9fA+ukRykQXFJG5QhB6faCgv/G+xtgEoePHQSqT5UjMf Bivmju9CUBeJZRonOrZqoGsgPv0BZspRU37kfy3jf/Fs2eucmqTIhI2BCqIwrogQjH ZNVIH2JyUj2bBFOcXqonoxSslpKMrOvFcjoAwiYE= Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 14:20:33 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Naoya Horiguchi Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko , Mike Kravetz , xishi.qiuxishi@alibaba-inc.com, "Chen, Jerry T" , "Zhuo, Qiuxu" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: soft-offline: return -EBUSY if set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page() fails Message-Id: <20190610142033.6096a8ec73d4bf40b2612fb5@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1560154686-18497-2-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> References: <1560154686-18497-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> <1560154686-18497-2-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:18:05 +0900 Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > The pass/fail of soft offline should be judged by checking whether the > raw error page was finally contained or not (i.e. the result of > set_hwpoison_free_buddy_page()), but current code do not work like that. > So this patch is suggesting to fix it. Please describe the user-visible runtime effects of this change?