mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 16/19] locking/rwsem: Guard against making count negative
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:27:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611132715.GJ3463@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190611131131.GG3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 03:11:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 04:59:15PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> 
> > +static inline long rwsem_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem, long *cnt)
> > +{
> > +	long adjustment = -RWSEM_READER_BIAS;
> > +
> > +	*cnt = atomic_long_fetch_add_acquire(RWSEM_READER_BIAS, &sem->count);
> 
> I'm thinking we'd actually want add_return_acquire() here.
> 
> > +	if (unlikely(*cnt < 0)) {
> > +		atomic_long_add(-RWSEM_READER_BIAS, &sem->count);
> > +		adjustment = 0;
> > +	}
> > +	return adjustment;
> > +}
> 
> > @@ -1271,9 +1332,10 @@ static struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_downgrade_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> >   */
> >  inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> >  {
> > +	long tmp, adjustment = rwsem_read_trylock(sem, &tmp);
> > +
> > +	if (unlikely(tmp & RWSEM_READ_FAILED_MASK)) {
> > +		rwsem_down_read_slowpath(sem, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, adjustment);
> >  		DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(!is_rwsem_reader_owned(sem), sem);
> >  	} else {
> >  		rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem);
> > @@ -1282,9 +1344,11 @@ inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> >  
> >  static inline int __down_read_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> >  {
> > +	long tmp, adjustment = rwsem_read_trylock(sem, &tmp);
> > +
> > +	if (unlikely(tmp & RWSEM_READ_FAILED_MASK)) {
> > +		if (IS_ERR(rwsem_down_read_slowpath(sem, TASK_KILLABLE,
> > +						    adjustment)))
> >  			return -EINTR;
> >  		DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(!is_rwsem_reader_owned(sem), sem);
> >  	} else {
> 
> I'm confused by the need for @tmp; isn't that returning the exact same
> state !adjustment is?

Argh.. READ_FAILED_MASK isn't just the MSB. Bah, this is confusing.

Maybe something like so?

--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -116,13 +116,28 @@
 #endif
 
 /*
- * The definition of the atomic counter in the semaphore:
+ * On 64-bit architectures, the bit definitions of the count are:
  *
- * Bit  0   - writer locked bit
- * Bit  1   - waiters present bit
- * Bit  2   - lock handoff bit
- * Bits 3-7 - reserved
- * Bits 8-X - 24-bit (32-bit) or 56-bit reader count
+ * Bit  0    - writer locked bit
+ * Bit  1    - waiters present bit
+ * Bit  2    - lock handoff bit
+ * Bits 3-7  - reserved
+ * Bits 8-62 - 55-bit reader count
+ * Bit  63   - read fail bit
+ *
+ * On 32-bit architectures, the bit definitions of the count are:
+ *
+ * Bit  0    - writer locked bit
+ * Bit  1    - waiters present bit
+ * Bit  2    - lock handoff bit
+ * Bits 3-7  - reserved
+ * Bits 8-30 - 23-bit reader count
+ * Bit  31   - read fail bit
+ *
+ * It is not likely that the most significant bit (read fail bit) will ever
+ * be set. This guard bit is still checked anyway in the down_read() fastpath
+ * just in case we need to use up more of the reader bits for other purpose
+ * in the future.
  *
  * atomic_long_fetch_add() is used to obtain reader lock, whereas
  * atomic_long_cmpxchg() will be used to obtain writer lock.
@@ -139,6 +154,7 @@
 #define RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED	(1UL << 0)
 #define RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS	(1UL << 1)
 #define RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF	(1UL << 2)
+#define RWSEM_FLAG_READFAIL	(1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - 1))
 
 #define RWSEM_READER_SHIFT	8
 #define RWSEM_READER_BIAS	(1UL << RWSEM_READER_SHIFT)
@@ -146,7 +162,7 @@
 #define RWSEM_WRITER_MASK	RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED
 #define RWSEM_LOCK_MASK		(RWSEM_WRITER_MASK|RWSEM_READER_MASK)
 #define RWSEM_READ_FAILED_MASK	(RWSEM_WRITER_MASK|RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS|\
-				 RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF)
+				 RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF|RWSEM_FLAG_READFAIL)
 
 /*
  * All writes to owner are protected by WRITE_ONCE() to make sure that
@@ -254,6 +270,14 @@ static inline void rwsem_set_nonspinnabl
 					  owner | RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE));
 }
 
+static inline bool rwsem_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	unsigned long cnt = atomic_long_add_return_acquire(RWSEM_READER_BIAS, &sem->count);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(cnt < 0);
+	return !(cnt & RWSEM_READ_FAILED_MASK);
+
+}
+
 /*
  * Return just the real task structure pointer of the owner
  */
@@ -403,6 +427,12 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_se
 	}
 
 	/*
+	 * No reader wakeup if there are too many of them already.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) < 0))
+		return;
+
+	/*
 	 * Writers might steal the lock before we grant it to the next reader.
 	 * We prefer to do the first reader grant before counting readers
 	 * so we can bail out early if a writer stole the lock.
@@ -949,9 +979,9 @@ static struct rw_semaphore __sched *
 rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
 {
 	long count, adjustment = -RWSEM_READER_BIAS;
-	bool wake = false;
 	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
 	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+	bool wake = false;
 
 	/*
 	 * Save the current read-owner of rwsem, if available, and the
@@ -1270,8 +1300,7 @@ static struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_downgr
  */
 inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
-	if (unlikely(atomic_long_fetch_add_acquire(RWSEM_READER_BIAS,
-			&sem->count) & RWSEM_READ_FAILED_MASK)) {
+	if (!rwsem_read_trylock(sem)) {
 		rwsem_down_read_slowpath(sem, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 		DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(!is_rwsem_reader_owned(sem), sem);
 	} else {
@@ -1281,9 +1310,8 @@ inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaph
 
 static inline int __down_read_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
-	if (unlikely(atomic_long_fetch_add_acquire(RWSEM_READER_BIAS,
-			&sem->count) & RWSEM_READ_FAILED_MASK)) {
-		if (IS_ERR(rwsem_down_read_slowpath(sem, TASK_KILLABLE)))
+	if (!rwsem_read_trylock(sem)) {
+		if (IS_ERR(rwsem_down_read_slowpath(sem, TASK_KILLABLE));
 			return -EINTR;
 		DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(!is_rwsem_reader_owned(sem), sem);
 	} else {
@@ -1359,6 +1387,7 @@ inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphor
 	DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(!is_rwsem_reader_owned(sem), sem);
 	rwsem_clear_reader_owned(sem);
 	tmp = atomic_long_add_return_release(-RWSEM_READER_BIAS, &sem->count);
+	DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(tmp < 0, sem);
 	if (unlikely((tmp & (RWSEM_LOCK_MASK|RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) ==
 		      RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS)) {
 		clear_wr_nonspinnable(sem);

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-11 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-20 20:58 [PATCH v8 00/19] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 2 Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 01/19] locking/rwsem: Make owner available even if !CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER Waiman Long
2019-06-17 14:23   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 02/19] locking/rwsem: Remove rwsem_wake() wakeup optimization Waiman Long
2019-06-17 14:24   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 03/19] locking/rwsem: Implement a new locking scheme Waiman Long
2019-06-17 14:24   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 04/19] locking/rwsem: Merge rwsem.h and rwsem-xadd.c into rwsem.c Waiman Long
2019-06-17 14:25   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 05/19] locking/rwsem: Code cleanup after files merging Waiman Long
2019-06-17 14:26   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 06/19] locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_spin_on_owner() return owner state Waiman Long
2019-06-17 14:27   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 07/19] locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation Waiman Long
2019-06-04  3:03   ` Yuyang Du
2019-06-04  3:26     ` Yuyang Du
2019-06-04  9:12       ` Boqun Feng
2019-06-04 16:00         ` Waiman Long
2019-06-05  7:48           ` Yuyang Du
2019-06-04 13:21       ` Waiman Long
2019-06-17 14:27   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 08/19] locking/rwsem: Always release wait_lock before waking up tasks Waiman Long
2019-06-17 14:28   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 09/19] locking/rwsem: More optimal RT task handling of null owner Waiman Long
2019-06-17 14:29   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 10/19] locking/rwsem: Wake up almost all readers in wait queue Waiman Long
2019-06-17 14:29   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 11/19] locking/rwsem: Clarify usage of owner's nonspinaable bit Waiman Long
2019-06-17 14:30   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 12/19] locking/rwsem: Enable readers spinning on writer Waiman Long
2019-06-17 14:31   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 13/19] locking/rwsem: Make rwsem->owner an atomic_long_t Waiman Long
2019-06-04  8:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-04 15:44     ` Waiman Long
2019-06-17 14:32   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-07-19 18:45   ` [PATCH v8 13/19] " Luis Henriques
2019-07-19 19:32     ` Waiman Long
2019-07-19 19:45       ` Luis Henriques
2019-07-19 20:14         ` Waiman Long
2019-07-19 19:51       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-07-20  8:41         ` Luis Henriques
2019-07-20  9:32           ` Luis Henriques
2019-07-20  9:45             ` Luis Henriques
2019-07-20 11:10           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-20 15:04           ` Waiman Long
2019-07-21 20:49             ` Luis Henriques
2019-07-23  2:57               ` Waiman Long
2019-07-25 15:59             ` [tip:locking/core] locking/rwsem: Don't call owner_on_cpu() on read-owner tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 14/19] locking/rwsem: Enable time-based spinning on reader-owned rwsem Waiman Long
2019-06-04  9:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-04 16:54     ` Waiman Long
2019-06-17 14:32   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 15/19] locking/rwsem: Adaptive disabling of reader optimistic spinning Waiman Long
2019-06-04  9:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-04 17:28     ` Waiman Long
2019-06-04  9:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-04 17:29     ` Waiman Long
2019-06-04  9:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-04 17:30     ` Waiman Long
2019-06-04 17:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-04 18:04         ` Waiman Long
2019-06-04 18:14           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-04 18:21             ` Waiman Long
2019-06-05 18:13               ` Waiman Long
2019-06-05 20:19                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-05 20:52                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-06  8:03                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-06  8:11                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-04 10:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-17 14:33   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 16/19] locking/rwsem: Guard against making count negative Waiman Long
2019-06-11 13:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-11 13:27     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-06-11 13:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-17 14:34   ` [tip:locking/core] " tip-bot for Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 17/19] locking/rwsem: Merge owner into count on x86-64 Waiman Long
2019-06-04  9:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-04 15:47     ` Waiman Long
2019-06-04 17:02       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-04 17:06         ` Waiman Long
2019-06-04 17:18           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 18/19] locking/rwsem: Remove redundant computation of writer lock word Waiman Long
2019-05-20 20:59 ` [PATCH v8 19/19] locking/rwsem: Disable preemption in down_read*() if owner in count Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190611132715.GJ3463@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome