From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/static_key: always define static_branch_deferred_inc
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:59:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190612125911.509d79f2@cakuba.netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190612194409.197461-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:44:09 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>
> This interface is currently only defined if CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL. Make it
> available also when jump labels are disabled.
>
> Fixes: ad282a8117d50 ("locking/static_key: Add support for deferred static branches")
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>
> ---
>
> The original patch went into 5.2-rc1, but this interface is not yet
> used, so this could target either 5.2 or 5.3.
Can we drop the Fixes tag? It's an ugly omission but not a bug fix.
Are you planning to switch clean_acked_data_enable() to the helper once
merged?
Thanks!
> diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h b/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
> index 42710d5949ba..8c3ee291b2d8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
> +++ b/include/linux/jump_label_ratelimit.h
> @@ -60,8 +60,6 @@ extern void jump_label_update_timeout(struct work_struct *work);
> 0), \
> }
>
> -#define static_branch_deferred_inc(x) static_branch_inc(&(x)->key)
> -
> #else /* !CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL */
> struct static_key_deferred {
> struct static_key key;
> @@ -95,4 +93,7 @@ jump_label_rate_limit(struct static_key_deferred *key,
> STATIC_KEY_CHECK_USE(key);
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL */
> +
> +#define static_branch_deferred_inc(x) static_branch_inc(&(x)->key)
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_JUMP_LABEL_RATELIMIT_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-12 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 19:44 Willem de Bruijn
2019-06-12 19:59 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2019-06-12 20:25 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-06-12 20:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-06-13 9:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-13 15:10 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190612125911.509d79f2@cakuba.netronome.com \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®