From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
Christopherson Sean J <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/resctrl: Get max rmid and occupancy scale directly from CPUID instead of cpuinfo_x86
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 01:35:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190617083502.GD214090@romley-ivt3.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190617083048.GE27127@zn.tnic>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:30:48AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 01:09:09AM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > I just keep the code a bit uniform around the calling area where
> > a few functions are called. So get_cqm_info() makes the code a bit more
> > readable.
> >
> > init_scattered_cpuid_features(c);
> > init_speculation_control(c);
> > + get_cqm_info(c);
> >
> > /*
> > * Clear/Set all flags overridden by options, after probe.
> > * This needs to happen each time we re-probe, which may happen
> > * several times during CPU initialization.
> > */
> > apply_forced_caps(c);
> > }
> >
> > Maybe not? If the function is not good, I can directly put the code here?
>
> If you want to have it cleaner, make that a separate patch and say so in
> the commit message. Patches should do one logical thing and not mix up
> different changes which makes review harder.
So in patch 0001, move the code of getting CQM info from before
calling init_scattered_cpuid_features(c) to after calling the function.
Then in patch 0002, carve out the code of getting CQM info into a
helper function get_cqm_info(c) for cleaner code.
Is this OK? Or the patch 0002 is unnecessary?
Thanks.
-Fenghua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-17 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-16 17:14 [PATCH 0/3] x86/cpufeatures: Re-arrange a few features and enumerate AVX512 BFLOAT16 intructions Fenghua Yu
2019-06-16 17:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/resctrl: Get max rmid and occupancy scale directly from CPUID instead of cpuinfo_x86 Fenghua Yu
2019-06-16 17:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-17 3:28 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-06-16 20:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-17 3:18 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-06-17 7:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-17 8:09 ` Fenghua Yu
2019-06-17 8:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-17 8:35 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2019-06-17 9:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-16 17:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/cpufeatures: Combine word 11 and 12 into new scattered features word 11 Fenghua Yu
2019-06-16 17:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate new AVX512 BFLOAT16 instructions Fenghua Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190617083502.GD214090@romley-ivt3.sc.intel.com \
--to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®