From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH arm] Use common outgoing-CPU-notification code
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 12:58:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190617115809.GA3767@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190611192410.GA27930@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:24:10PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> This commit removes the open-coded CPU-offline notification with new
> common code. In particular, this change avoids calling scheduler code
> using RCU from an offline CPU that RCU is ignoring. This is a minimal
> change. A more intrusive change might invoke the cpu_check_up_prepare()
> and cpu_set_state_online() functions at CPU-online time, which would
> allow onlining throw an error if the CPU did not go offline properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
FWIW:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
On the assumption that Russell is ok with this, I think this should be
dropped into the ARM patch system [1].
Paul, are you familiar with that, or would you prefer that someone else
submits the patch there? I can do so if you'd like.
Thanks,
Mark.
[1] https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/info.php
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> index ebc53804d57b..8687d619260f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -267,15 +267,13 @@ int __cpu_disable(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static DECLARE_COMPLETION(cpu_died);
> -
> /*
> * called on the thread which is asking for a CPU to be shutdown -
> * waits until shutdown has completed, or it is timed out.
> */
> void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&cpu_died, msecs_to_jiffies(5000))) {
> + if (!cpu_wait_death(cpu, 5)) {
> pr_err("CPU%u: cpu didn't die\n", cpu);
> return;
> }
> @@ -322,7 +320,7 @@ void arch_cpu_idle_dead(void)
> * this returns, power and/or clocks can be removed at any point
> * from this CPU and its cache by platform_cpu_kill().
> */
> - complete(&cpu_died);
> + (void)cpu_report_death();
>
> /*
> * Ensure that the cache lines associated with that completion are
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-17 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-11 19:24 Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-17 11:58 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2019-06-17 13:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-26 16:42 ` Mark Rutland
2019-06-26 17:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190617115809.GA3767@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®