From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tipbuild@zytor.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [tip:perf/core 23/33] arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c:781:23: error: 'INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_DESKTOP' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_DESKTOP'?
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:38:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201906200702.n7RdDWBw%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4175 bytes --]
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git perf/core
head: 3ce5aceb5dee298b082adfa2baa0df5a447c1b0b
commit: 2a538fda82824a7722e296be656bb5d11d91a9cb [23/33] perf/x86/intel: Add Icelake desktop CPUID
config: x86_64-rhel-7.6 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0
reproduce:
git checkout 2a538fda82824a7722e296be656bb5d11d91a9cb
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c:781:23: error: 'INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_DESKTOP' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_DESKTOP'?
X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_DESKTOP, skl_rapl_init),
^
arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c:702:25: note: in definition of macro 'X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH'
{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, (unsigned long)&init }
^~~~~
--
>> arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c:1406:25: error: 'INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_DESKTOP' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_DESKTOP'?
X86_UNCORE_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_DESKTOP, icl_uncore_init),
^
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c:1303:25: note: in definition of macro 'X86_UNCORE_MODEL_MATCH'
{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, (unsigned long)&init }
^~~~~
--
>> arch/x86/events/intel/cstate.c:583:20: error: 'INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_DESKTOP' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_DESKTOP'?
X86_CSTATES_MODEL(INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_DESKTOP, snb_cstates),
^
arch/x86/events/intel/cstate.c:533:25: note: in definition of macro 'X86_CSTATES_MODEL'
{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, (unsigned long) &(states) }
^~~~~
vim +781 arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
745
746 static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_cpu_match[] __initconst = {
747 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_SANDYBRIDGE, snb_rapl_init),
748 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_SANDYBRIDGE_X, snbep_rapl_init),
749
750 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_IVYBRIDGE, snb_rapl_init),
751 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_IVYBRIDGE_X, snbep_rapl_init),
752
753 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_CORE, hsw_rapl_init),
754 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_X, hsx_rapl_init),
755 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_ULT, hsw_rapl_init),
756 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_GT3E, hsw_rapl_init),
757
758 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_CORE, hsw_rapl_init),
759 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_GT3E, hsw_rapl_init),
760 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_X, hsx_rapl_init),
761 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_XEON_D, hsx_rapl_init),
762
763 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_XEON_PHI_KNL, knl_rapl_init),
764 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_XEON_PHI_KNM, knl_rapl_init),
765
766 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_MOBILE, skl_rapl_init),
767 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_DESKTOP, skl_rapl_init),
768 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X, hsx_rapl_init),
769
770 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_MOBILE, skl_rapl_init),
771 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_DESKTOP, skl_rapl_init),
772
773 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_CANNONLAKE_MOBILE, skl_rapl_init),
774
775 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_GOLDMONT, hsw_rapl_init),
776 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_GOLDMONT_X, hsw_rapl_init),
777
778 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_GOLDMONT_PLUS, hsw_rapl_init),
779
780 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_MOBILE, skl_rapl_init),
> 781 X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_DESKTOP, skl_rapl_init),
782 {},
783 };
784
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 47435 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2019-06-19 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-19 23:38 kbuild test robot [this message]
2019-06-20 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201906200702.n7RdDWBw%lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tipbuild@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®