mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/isolation: Prefer housekeeping cpu in local node
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 14:38:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190620123807.GX3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1561030614-17026-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>

On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 07:36:54PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> 
> In real product setup, there will be houseeking cpus in each nodes, it 
> is prefer to do housekeeping from local node, fallback to global online 
> cpumask if failed to find houseeking cpu from local node.
> 
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> 
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/isolation.c | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> index 123ea07..9eb6805 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> @@ -16,9 +16,16 @@ static unsigned int housekeeping_flags;
>  
>  int housekeeping_any_cpu(enum hk_flags flags)
>  {
> +	int cpu;
> +
>  	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
> -		if (housekeeping_flags & flags)
> -			return cpumask_any_and(housekeeping_mask, cpu_online_mask);
> +		if (housekeeping_flags & flags) {
> +			cpu = cpumask_any_and(housekeeping_mask, cpu_cpu_mask(smp_processor_id()));
> +			if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
> +				return cpu;
> +			else
> +				return cpumask_any_and(housekeeping_mask, cpu_online_mask);
> +		}
>  	return smp_processor_id();
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_any_cpu);

Why not something like so? IIRC there's more places that want this, but
I can't seem to remember quite where.

diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
index 123ea07a3f3b..1cceab5f094c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
@@ -16,9 +16,15 @@ static unsigned int housekeeping_flags;
 
 int housekeeping_any_cpu(enum hk_flags flags)
 {
-	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
-		if (housekeeping_flags & flags)
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden)) {
+		if (housekeeping_flags & flags) {
+			cpu = sched_numa_find_closest(housekeeping_mask, smp_processor_id());
+			if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
+				return cpu;
+
 			return cpumask_any_and(housekeeping_mask, cpu_online_mask);
+		}
+	}
 	return smp_processor_id();
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_any_cpu);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index b08dee29ef5e..0db7431c7207 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1212,9 +1212,6 @@ enum numa_topology_type {
 extern enum numa_topology_type sched_numa_topology_type;
 extern int sched_max_numa_distance;
 extern bool find_numa_distance(int distance);
-#endif
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
 extern void sched_init_numa(void);
 extern void sched_domains_numa_masks_set(unsigned int cpu);
 extern void sched_domains_numa_masks_clear(unsigned int cpu);
@@ -1224,6 +1221,8 @@ static inline void sched_domains_numa_masks_set(unsigned int cpu) { }
 static inline void sched_domains_numa_masks_clear(unsigned int cpu) { }
 #endif
 
+extern int sched_numa_find_closest(const struct cpumask *cpus, int cpu);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
 /* The regions in numa_faults array from task_struct */
 enum numa_faults_stats {
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 63184cf0d0d7..408e94a6637c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -1726,6 +1726,20 @@ void sched_domains_numa_masks_clear(unsigned int cpu)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
 
+int sched_numa_find_closest(const struct cpumask *cpus, int cpu)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
+	int i, j = cpu_to_node(cpu);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < sched_domains_numa_levels; ++) {
+		cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpus, sched_domains_numa_mask[i][j]);
+		if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
+			return cpu;
+	}
+#endif
+	return nr_cpu_ids;
+}
+
 static int __sdt_alloc(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
 {
 	struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl;

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-20 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-20 11:36 Wanpeng Li
2019-06-20 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-06-21  1:36   ` Wanpeng Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190620123807.GX3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®