From: Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
hdegoede@redhat.com, david.e.box@linux.intel.com,
linux@endlessm.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: No 8254 PIT & no HPET on new Intel N3350 platforms causes kernel panic during early boot
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:54:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190627085419.27854-1-drake@endlessm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904031206440.1967@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Hi Thomas,
Picking up this issue again after a break!
We made some progress last time on reducing PIT usage in the TSC
calibration code, but we still have the bigger issue to resolve:
IO-APIC code panicing when the PIT isn't ticking.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 7:21 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> For newer CPUs we might assume that:
>
> 1) The TSC and APIC timer are actually usable
>
> 2) The frequencies can be retrieved from CPUID or MSRs
>
> If #1 and #2 are reliable we can avoid the whole calibration and interrupt
> delivery mess.
>
> That means we need the following decision logic:
>
> 1) If HPET is available in ACPI, boot normal.
>
> 2) If HPET is not available, verify that the PIT actually counts. If it
> does, boot normal.
>
> If it does not either:
>
> 2A) Verify that this is a PCH 300/C240 and fiddle with that ISST bit.
>
> But that means that we need to chase PCH ids forever...
>
> 2B) Shrug and just avoid the whole PIT/HPET magic all over the place:
>
> - Avoid the interrupt delivery check in the IOAPIC code as it's
> uninteresting in that case. Trivial to do.
I tried to explore this idea here:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1064972/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1064971/
But I can't say I really knew what I was doing there, and you
pointed out some problems.
Any new ideas that I can experiment with?
Being more conservative, how about something like this?
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
index 53aa234a6803..36b1e7d5b657 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -2073,7 +2073,7 @@ static int mp_alloc_timer_irq(int ioapic, int pin)
*
* FIXME: really need to revamp this for all platforms.
*/
-static inline void __init check_timer(void)
+static inline void __init check_timer(int timer_was_working)
{
struct irq_data *irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(0);
struct mp_chip_data *data = irq_data->chip_data;
@@ -2216,8 +2216,15 @@ static inline void __init check_timer(void)
apic_printk(APIC_QUIET, KERN_INFO
"Perhaps problem with the pre-enabled x2apic mode\n"
"Try booting with x2apic and interrupt-remapping disabled in the bios.\n");
- panic("IO-APIC + timer doesn't work! Boot with apic=debug and send a "
- "report. Then try booting with the 'noapic' option.\n");
+
+ if (timer_was_working)
+ panic("IO-APIC + timer doesn't work! Boot with apic=debug and send a "
+ "report. Then try booting with the 'noapic' option.\n");
+ else
+ apic_printk(APIC_QUIET, KERN_INFO
+ "Continuing anyway with no 8254 timer, as it was not working even before IO-APIC setup was attempted.\n"
+ "Boot will fail unless another working clocksource is found.\n");
+
out:
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
@@ -2304,12 +2311,20 @@ static void ioapic_destroy_irqdomain(int idx)
void __init setup_IO_APIC(void)
{
int ioapic;
+ int timer_was_working = 0;
if (skip_ioapic_setup || !nr_ioapics)
return;
io_apic_irqs = nr_legacy_irqs() ? ~PIC_IRQS : ~0UL;
+ /*
+ * Record if the timer was in working state before we do any
+ * IO-APIC setup.
+ */
+ if (nr_legacy_irqs())
+ timer_was_working = timer_irq_works();
+
apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs\n");
for_each_ioapic(ioapic)
BUG_ON(mp_irqdomain_create(ioapic));
@@ -2323,7 +2338,7 @@ void __init setup_IO_APIC(void)
setup_IO_APIC_irqs();
init_IO_APIC_traps();
if (nr_legacy_irqs())
- check_timer();
+ check_timer(timer_was_working);
ioapic_initialized = 1;
}
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-27 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-03 7:49 Daniel Drake
2019-04-03 11:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-03 12:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-09 5:43 ` Daniel Drake
2019-04-10 12:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-16 5:21 ` Daniel Drake
2019-05-09 10:35 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/tsc: Set LAPIC timer period to crystal clock frequency tip-bot for Daniel Drake
2019-06-27 8:54 ` Daniel Drake [this message]
2019-06-27 14:06 ` No 8254 PIT & no HPET on new Intel N3350 platforms causes kernel panic during early boot Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-28 3:33 ` Daniel Drake
2019-06-28 5:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-17 5:28 Detecting x86 LAPIC timer frequency from CPUID data Daniel Drake
2019-04-18 13:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-18 22:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-19 8:35 ` Daniel Drake
2019-04-19 8:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-19 20:50 ` Jacob Pan
2019-04-19 20:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-19 23:09 ` Jacob Pan
2019-05-09 10:34 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/tsc: Use CPUID.0x16 to calculate missing crystal frequency tip-bot for Daniel Drake
2019-05-09 5:54 [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/tsc: use " Daniel Drake
2019-05-09 5:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/apic: rename lapic_timer_frequency to lapic_timer_period Daniel Drake
2019-05-09 10:34 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/apic: Rename 'lapic_timer_frequency' to 'lapic_timer_period' tip-bot for Daniel Drake
2019-05-09 5:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/tsc: set LAPIC timer period to crystal clock frequency Daniel Drake
2019-05-09 7:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/tsc: use CPUID.0x16 to calculate missing crystal frequency Thomas Gleixner
2019-05-09 9:07 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190627085419.27854-1-drake@endlessm.com \
--to=drake@endlessm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@endlessm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®