From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8777C4321A for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2412133F for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726667AbfF1BHL (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 21:07:11 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44966 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726595AbfF1BHK (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2019 21:07:10 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69C52208E3; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 01:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 21:07:07 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Takeshi Misawa Cc: Tom Zanussi , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix memory leak in tracing_err_log_open() Message-ID: <20190627210707.49ebbcf1@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20190627210231.07cb24aa@gandalf.local.home> References: <20190627114116.GA2533@DESKTOP> <20190627210231.07cb24aa@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 21:02:31 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c > > @@ -7126,12 +7126,24 @@ static ssize_t tracing_err_log_write(struct file *file, > > return count; > > } > > > > +static int tracing_err_log_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) > > +{ > > + struct trace_array *tr = inode->i_private; > > + > > + trace_array_put(tr); > > + > > + if (file->private_data) Actually, I think it is safer to have the condition be: if (file->f_mode & FMODE_READ) As that would match the open. Takeshi, Can you send a v2? Thanks! -- Steve > > + seq_release(inode, file); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > +