mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, frederic@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	cai@lca.pw, Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: Fix lock used or unused stats error
Date: Tue,  9 Jul 2019 18:15:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190709101522.9117-1-duyuyang@gmail.com> (raw)

The stats variable nr_unused_locks is incremented every time a new lock
class is register and decremented when the lock is first used in
__lock_acquire(). And after all, it is shown and checked in lockdep_stats.

However, under configurations that either CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS or
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is not defined:

The commit:

  091806515124b20 ("locking/lockdep: Consolidate lock usage bit initialization")

missed marking the LOCK_USED flag at IRQ usage initialization because
as mark_usage() is not called. And the commit:

  886532aee3cd42d ("locking/lockdep: Move mark_lock() inside
CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING")

further made mark_lock() not defined such that the LOCK_USED cannot be
marked at all when the lock is first acquired.

As a result, we fix this by not showing and checking the stats under such
configurations for lockdep_stats.

Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
index 9c49ec6..65b6a16 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c
@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		      nr_hardirq_read_safe = 0, nr_hardirq_read_unsafe = 0,
 		      sum_forward_deps = 0;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
 	list_for_each_entry(class, &all_lock_classes, lock_entry) {
 
 		if (class->usage_mask == 0)
@@ -241,13 +242,13 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ)
 			nr_hardirq_read_unsafe++;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
 		sum_forward_deps += lockdep_count_forward_deps(class);
-#endif
 	}
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP
 	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(debug_atomic_read(nr_unused_locks) != nr_unused);
 #endif
+
+#endif
 	seq_printf(m, " lock-classes:                  %11lu [max: %lu]\n",
 			nr_lock_classes, MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS);
 	seq_printf(m, " direct dependencies:           %11lu [max: %lu]\n",
-- 
1.8.3.1


             reply	other threads:[~2019-07-09 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-09 10:15 Yuyang Du [this message]
2019-07-09 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-13 11:14 ` [tip:locking/urgent] " tip-bot for Yuyang Du

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190709101522.9117-1-duyuyang@gmail.com \
    --to=duyuyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome