mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	quentin.perret@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com, pauld@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: rework load_balance
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 14:54:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190719125443.GJ3419@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1563523105-24673-4-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 09:58:23AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 67f0acd..472959df 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5376,18 +5376,6 @@ static unsigned long capacity_of(int cpu)
>  	return cpu_rq(cpu)->cpu_capacity;
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned long cpu_avg_load_per_task(int cpu)
> -{
> -	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> -	unsigned long nr_running = READ_ONCE(rq->cfs.h_nr_running);
> -	unsigned long load_avg = cpu_runnable_load(rq);
> -
> -	if (nr_running)
> -		return load_avg / nr_running;
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static void record_wakee(struct task_struct *p)
>  {
>  	/*

> @@ -7646,7 +7669,6 @@ static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p)
>  struct sg_lb_stats {
>  	unsigned long avg_load; /*Avg load across the CPUs of the group */
>  	unsigned long group_load; /* Total load over the CPUs of the group */
> -	unsigned long load_per_task;
>  	unsigned long group_capacity;
>  	unsigned long group_util; /* Total utilization of the group */
>  	unsigned int sum_nr_running; /* Nr tasks running in the group */


> @@ -8266,76 +8293,6 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * fix_small_imbalance - Calculate the minor imbalance that exists
> - *			amongst the groups of a sched_domain, during
> - *			load balancing.
> - * @env: The load balancing environment.
> - * @sds: Statistics of the sched_domain whose imbalance is to be calculated.
> - */
> -static inline
> -void fix_small_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
> -{
> -	unsigned long tmp, capa_now = 0, capa_move = 0;
> -	unsigned int imbn = 2;
> -	unsigned long scaled_busy_load_per_task;
> -	struct sg_lb_stats *local, *busiest;
> -
> -	local = &sds->local_stat;
> -	busiest = &sds->busiest_stat;
> -
> -	if (!local->sum_h_nr_running)
> -		local->load_per_task = cpu_avg_load_per_task(env->dst_cpu);
> -	else if (busiest->load_per_task > local->load_per_task)
> -		imbn = 1;
> -
> -	scaled_busy_load_per_task =
> -		(busiest->load_per_task * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) /
> -		busiest->group_capacity;
> -
> -	if (busiest->avg_load + scaled_busy_load_per_task >=
> -	    local->avg_load + (scaled_busy_load_per_task * imbn)) {
> -		env->imbalance = busiest->load_per_task;
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * OK, we don't have enough imbalance to justify moving tasks,
> -	 * however we may be able to increase total CPU capacity used by
> -	 * moving them.
> -	 */
> -
> -	capa_now += busiest->group_capacity *
> -			min(busiest->load_per_task, busiest->avg_load);
> -	capa_now += local->group_capacity *
> -			min(local->load_per_task, local->avg_load);
> -	capa_now /= SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
> -
> -	/* Amount of load we'd subtract */
> -	if (busiest->avg_load > scaled_busy_load_per_task) {
> -		capa_move += busiest->group_capacity *
> -			    min(busiest->load_per_task,
> -				busiest->avg_load - scaled_busy_load_per_task);
> -	}
> -
> -	/* Amount of load we'd add */
> -	if (busiest->avg_load * busiest->group_capacity <
> -	    busiest->load_per_task * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) {
> -		tmp = (busiest->avg_load * busiest->group_capacity) /
> -		      local->group_capacity;
> -	} else {
> -		tmp = (busiest->load_per_task * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) /
> -		      local->group_capacity;
> -	}
> -	capa_move += local->group_capacity *
> -		    min(local->load_per_task, local->avg_load + tmp);
> -	capa_move /= SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
> -
> -	/* Move if we gain throughput */
> -	if (capa_move > capa_now)
> -		env->imbalance = busiest->load_per_task;
> -}
> -
> -/**
>   * calculate_imbalance - Calculate the amount of imbalance present within the
>   *			 groups of a given sched_domain during load balance.
>   * @env: load balance environment

Maybe strip this out first, in a separate patch. It's all magic doo-doo.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-19 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-19  7:58 [PATCH 0/5] sched/fair: rework the CFS load balance Vincent Guittot
2019-07-19  7:58 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: clean up asym packing Vincent Guittot
2019-07-19  7:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: rename sum_nr_running to sum_h_nr_running Vincent Guittot
2019-07-19 12:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-19 13:44     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-07-26  2:17   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2019-07-26  8:41     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-07-19  7:58 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: rework load_balance Vincent Guittot
2019-07-19 12:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-19 13:46     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-07-19 12:54   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-07-19 14:02     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-07-20 11:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-19 13:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-19 13:57     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-07-19 13:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-19 14:13     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-07-19 13:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-19 13:55     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-07-25 17:17   ` Valentin Schneider
2019-07-26  9:01     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-07-26 10:41       ` Valentin Schneider
2019-07-26 12:30         ` Vincent Guittot
2019-07-26 14:01           ` Valentin Schneider
2019-07-26 14:47             ` Vincent Guittot
2019-07-29 14:28               ` Valentin Schneider
2019-07-26 13:58   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2019-07-26 14:09     ` Valentin Schneider
2019-07-26 14:42     ` Vincent Guittot
2019-07-31 13:43       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2019-07-31 15:37         ` Vincent Guittot
2019-07-19  7:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: use load instead of runnable load Vincent Guittot
2019-07-19  7:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: evenly spread tasks when not overloaded Vincent Guittot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190719125443.GJ3419@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome