From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Suthikulpanit,
Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/topology: Improve load balancing on AMD EPYC
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:42:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190723114248.GJ24383@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190723104830.26623-1-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:48:30AM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> SD_BALANCE_{FORK,EXEC} and SD_WAKE_AFFINE are stripped in sd_init()
> for any sched domains with a NUMA distance greater than 2 hops
> (RECLAIM_DISTANCE). The idea being that it's expensive to balance
> across domains that far apart.
>
> However, as is rather unfortunately explained in
>
> commit 32e45ff43eaf ("mm: increase RECLAIM_DISTANCE to 30")
>
> the value for RECLAIM_DISTANCE is based on node distance tables from
> 2011-era hardware.
>
> Current AMD EPYC machines have the following NUMA node distances:
>
> node distances:
> node 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> 0: 10 16 16 16 32 32 32 32
> 1: 16 10 16 16 32 32 32 32
> 2: 16 16 10 16 32 32 32 32
> 3: 16 16 16 10 32 32 32 32
> 4: 32 32 32 32 10 16 16 16
> 5: 32 32 32 32 16 10 16 16
> 6: 32 32 32 32 16 16 10 16
> 7: 32 32 32 32 16 16 16 10
>
> where 2 hops is 32.
>
> The result is that the scheduler fails to load balance properly across
> NUMA nodes on different sockets -- 2 hops apart.
>
> For example, pinning 16 busy threads to NUMA nodes 0 (CPUs 0-7) and 4
> (CPUs 32-39) like so,
>
> $ numactl -C 0-7,32-39 ./spinner 16
>
> causes all threads to fork and remain on node 0 until the active
> balancer kicks in after a few seconds and forcibly moves some threads
> to node 4.
>
> Override node_reclaim_distance for AMD Zen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
> Cc: "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> Cc: "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
The only caveat I can think of is that a future generation of Zen might
take a different magic number than 32 as their remote distance. If or
when this happens, it'll need additional smarts but lacking a crystal
ball, we can cross that bridge when we come to it.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-23 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-23 10:48 Matt Fleming
2019-07-23 11:42 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2019-07-23 12:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-23 13:03 ` Mel Gorman
2019-07-23 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-25 16:37 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-07-29 12:16 ` Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190723114248.GJ24383@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome