From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Miguel de Dios <migueldedios@google.com>,
Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
lkp@01.org
Subject: Re: [mm] 755d6edc1a: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -4.1% regression
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 10:04:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190806080415.GG11812@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190806070547.GA10123@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
On Tue 06-08-19 15:05:47, kernel test robot wrote:
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -4.1% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
I have to confess I cannot make much sense from numbers because they
seem to be too volatile and the main contributor doesn't stand up for
me. Anyway, regressions on microbenchmarks like this are not all that
surprising when a locking is slightly changed and the critical section
made shorter. I have seen that in the past already.
That being said I would still love to get to bottom of this bug rather
than play with the lock duration by a magic. In other words
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190730125751.GS9330@dhcp22.suse.cz
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-06 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-29 7:10 [PATCH] mm: release the spinlock on zap_pte_range Minchan Kim
2019-07-29 7:45 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-29 8:20 ` Minchan Kim
2019-07-29 8:35 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-30 12:11 ` Minchan Kim
2019-07-30 12:32 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-30 12:39 ` Minchan Kim
2019-07-30 12:57 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-31 5:44 ` Minchan Kim
2019-07-31 7:21 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-06 10:55 ` Minchan Kim
2019-08-09 12:43 ` [RFC PATCH] mm: drop mark_page_access from the unmap path Michal Hocko
2019-08-09 17:57 ` Mel Gorman
2019-08-09 18:34 ` Johannes Weiner
2019-08-12 8:09 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-12 15:07 ` Johannes Weiner
2019-08-13 10:51 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-26 12:06 ` Michal Hocko
2019-08-27 16:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2019-08-27 18:41 ` Michal Hocko
2019-07-30 19:42 ` [PATCH] mm: release the spinlock on zap_pte_range Andrew Morton
2019-07-31 6:14 ` Minchan Kim
2019-08-06 7:05 ` [mm] 755d6edc1a: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -4.1% regression kernel test robot
2019-08-06 8:04 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-08-06 11:00 ` Minchan Kim
2019-08-06 11:11 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190806080415.GG11812@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=migueldedios@google.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=wvw@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®