From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D973C31E40 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFE6214C6 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:19:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1565097572; bh=fwhYa36kicYLd4QAPZrcY2nHdSADWgG7TogiOuwcMIE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=pdLhr+WsSn1bV8O/t1VQDJTZvQdLPb+bjb2gwBxteoztVhbCV3xY3IPSJ2ZbApfLP RXPuhKcQY6x1zhumMlp3o6lzzWuxIOhQgi9oLfsyGLihgRx+P3BMj6UZqQcGexBcHC 6lkOhUSYCZsbz34aVOBpArRP2GVw+w3jUT+KR1Tw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731859AbfHFNTa (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Aug 2019 09:19:30 -0400 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:52606 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726877AbfHFNTa (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Aug 2019 09:19:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sirena.org.uk; s=20170815-heliosphere; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/YlBTsdKaLWiGTA3PgSDfUuNoWKMNUoS35CDFJHvndg=; b=wXJ0GPsyXW3kOHbFTuOfhIXfp 0tuUwVVQ+VRWj3g0WdMV33xltNLalzNIVhnDTNZDPy2Fe1tzCgG9SqLtQVatAaFR5x8CJSkD366pG +5lBZ03HBwKvUTXDBjjdUqHE5Ld3Msmt8mKMtFauycD6ygiJnL6CchvyIAr1gSV+HvmYI=; Received: from cpc102320-sgyl38-2-0-cust46.18-2.cable.virginm.net ([82.37.168.47] helo=ypsilon.sirena.org.uk) by heliosphere.sirena.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1huzN8-0004aT-5B; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 13:19:26 +0000 Received: by ypsilon.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 274A02742B67; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 14:19:25 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 14:19:25 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Liam Girdwood , lkml , Konstantin Ryabitsev Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] regulator fixes for v5.3 Message-ID: <20190806131925.GC4527@sirena.org.uk> References: <20190805143431.GH6432@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5G06lTa6Jq83wMTw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: All men have the right to wait in line. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --5G06lTa6Jq83wMTw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 11:42:29AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: Adding Konstantin. > these got marked as spam once again, because >=20 > dmarc=3Dfail (p=3DNONE sp=3DNONE dis=3DNONE) header.from=3Dkernel.org >=20 > and I think it's because you have >=20 > DKIM-Signature: v=3D1; a=3Drsa-sha256; q=3Ddns/txt; c=3Drelaxed/relaxe= d; > d=3Dsirena.org.uk; >=20 > but then you have >=20 > From: Mark Brown >=20 > so the DKIM signature is all correct, but it's correct for > sirena.org.uk, not for the sender information.. Well, AFAICT this is your mail provider deciding to impose their own requirements on things. (and for clarity it's only the From: that has kernel.org, the envelope sender has sirena.org.uk.) The DKIM signature there says that the sirena.org.uk systems are asserting that they take responsibility for the headers they sign, this is true and says nothing about the content of those headers other than you can tell if they were modified since leaving sirena.org.uk. The DMARC check is a separate one based on the domain reported in the address, kernel.org has one which explicitly advertises having no policy and only filtering 1% of outbound mail so shouldn't really mean anything for processing. DMARC can flag that there has to be a DKIM signature =66rom the domain in the headers but kernel.org doesn't do that. We *do* have a SPF record for kernel.org which I think isn't helping since it flags all hosts as being SOFTFAIL (the last match is ~all) which is supposed to be something along the lines of accept but flag, I can see your provider deciding that spam is the appropriate tag there. As far as I can see that'd also flag mail sent by things like the patchwork tracker bot similarly (it sends from mail.kernel.org which isn't advertised as a sender). I suspect Google will only be happy if I inject mail through them, possibly also if I filter kernel.org mail to redirect via kernel.org though that might still trip them up. --5G06lTa6Jq83wMTw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl1JflwACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BM4wf/Rx59c60W/6jq29u9EAPRAe3iUem2n9OYioKpZU+gVTmr08lf0m3nB6ih cTi5ehzBOSic1SyflKvj1tzT0DV971WRZvj2Z0mUppcNrv37ouUYxJf3qg8n5N+k qSS/1yHme62GA0nNvBa6vt/ZG8OwhAOB9T3fC5h5UlPx3ikh49TA3BAxjPcLHNmX VLCXVQrju0Tai8mCMpP9ugZnUXlG9Fmwu+ixw7c5kAkmAP3FjS/BsJAX5vCXlioe TvUIA0qEmezB1AeoVZiY6/f5L46Qucb82sQbjBzKOOxO+a/CAHOhPLWxQOVasnED 2IJmcn574cSJqu9OAPEQipJ3787wQg== =l47q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5G06lTa6Jq83wMTw--