Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing/arm: Fix the stack tracer when LR is saved after local storage

[Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>]

Hi Steve,

On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 12:34:01PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> As arm64 saves the link register after a function's local variables are
> stored, it causes the max stack tracer to be off by one in its output
> of which function has the bloated stack frame.

For reference, it's a bit more complex than that. :/

Our procedure call standard (the AAPCS) says that the frame record may
be placed anywhere within a stackframe, so we don't have a guarantee as
to where the saved lr will fall w.r.t local variables.

Today, GCC happens to create the stack frame by creating the stack
record, so the LR is saved at a lower addresss than the local variables.

However, I am aware that there are reasons why a compiler may choose to
place the frame record at a different locations, e.g. using pointer
authentication to provide an implicit stack canary, so this could change
in future, or potentially differ across functions.

Maybe that's a bridge we'll have to cross in future.

Thanks,
Mark.

> 
> The first patch fixes this by creating a ARCH_RET_ADDR_BEFORE_LOCAL_VARS
> define that an achitecture (arm64) may set in asm/ftrace.h, and this
> will cause the stack tracer to make the shift.
> 
> As it has been proven that the stack tracer isn't the most trivial
> algorithm to understand by staring at the code, the second patch adds
> comments to the code to explain the algorithm with and without the
> ARCH_RET_ADDR_BEFORE_LOCAL_VARS.
> 
> Hmm, should this be sent to stable (and for inclusion now?)
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> Steven Rostedt (VMware) (2):
>       tracing/arm64: Have max stack tracer handle the case of return address after data
>       tracing: Document the stack trace algorithm in the comments
> 
> ----
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h |   1 +
>  kernel/trace/trace_stack.c      | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 113 insertions(+)