From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E291C31E40 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362E1217D4 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 07:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727061AbfHLHku (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2019 03:40:50 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:45805 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725923AbfHLHku (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2019 03:40:50 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id F2F6768BFE; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 09:40:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 09:40:47 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , Bharata B Rao , Andrew Morton , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] memremap: provide a not device managed memremap_pages Message-ID: <20190812074047.GB4709@lst.de> References: <20190811081247.22111-1-hch@lst.de> <20190811081247.22111-6-hch@lst.de> <20190811225601.GC15116@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190811225601.GC15116@mellanox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:56:07PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > + * This version is not intended for system resources only, and there is no > > Was 'is not' what was intended here? I'm having a hard time reading > this. s/not//g